Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

According to one traditional definition, aesthetics is the branch of philosophy that deals with beauty, especially beauty in the arts. Examining the pleasing features of the Mona Lisa or a snow-capped mountain, for example, would come under aesthetics. That definition seems too narrow, however, since works of art and natural objects may interest us in other ways than by being beautiful. Instead of evoking admiration of beauty, artists may evoke puzzlement, shock, and even disgust. Consider Picasso's Guernica, a huge (11-ft. × 25.6-ft.) painting in black, white, and grey that he made in response to the slaughter of Spanish civilians by German and Italian warplanes during the Spanish Civil War. Images of disjointed corpses and people screaming dominate the canvas. This work is widely admired but not for being beautiful. So a better definition of aesthetics would be that it is the branch of philosophy that deals with the ways things please people in being experienced. Humor is prominent among the experiences we enjoy, and so the study of humor fits naturally under aesthetics. This entry examines the relation between humor and aesthetic experience and compares humor with other kinds of aesthetic experience.

Aesthetic Experience

A standard distinction in aesthetics is between aesthetic experiences—enjoying the way things look and sound and feel—and experiences in which we enjoy something because it is associated with something else we value. A rich man might enjoy looking at tall piles of $100 bills on his desk, for example, because they remind him how wealthy he is. But he is not enjoying the color, shape, texture, and other perceptible features of those bills, and so his experience is not aesthetic. In aesthetic experience, our interest in things is not practical; it is not in what those things can help us get or achieve. And our interest is not cognitive: We are not out to gain information. Instead we simply enjoy experiencing things.

While much of aesthetic experience is visual, hearing and touch can also be aesthetic. The sound of rain on the roof can please us, as can music. If we are emotionally struck by a piece of sculpture in a museum, we may want to run our fingers over its surface.

If the arts were limited to painting, drawing, sculpture, music, and dance, then we might think of aesthetic experience as a subset of perception. But there is also literature. In reading a novel or in listening to someone read poetry, much more is involved than the shapes of the letters on the page and the sound of the words being recited. Mostly what we enjoy are the thoughts evoked by those words; so aesthetic experience includes thinking as well as perceiving.

Humor as Aesthetic Experience

Although humor may seem like an obvious case of aesthetic experience, it was widely neglected in traditional aesthetics. Immanuel Kant, one of the first philosophers to analyze aesthetic experience, dismissed the pleasure we take in jokes as a nonaesthetic enjoyment of the physical stimulation of laughter. There is nothing to gratify the mind in jokes, he insisted, and so enjoying them is not aesthetic experience. Starting in the late-20th century, humor received more respect from philosophers, and today many of them hold that humor is often an aesthetic experience.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading