Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Changing the Client Versus Changing the Environment

Conventional approaches to working with clients in mental health and other therapeutic settings primarily involve the use of psychotherapy and/or medication to bring about changes in the clients that presumably allow the clients to better adapt to their life circumstances. However, in recent years there has been a shift in this perspective among several groups of practitioners who instead favor an approach that views the source of emotional suffering as residing in the environment rather than in the client. This focus assumes that it is not necessarily most beneficial to alter the client. In this alternative approach, the guiding principle is the need for social change rather than individual change.

This shift has been influenced by a number of developing trends in the disciplines of psychiatry, psychology, social work, and allied helping professions. There is growing recognition that current dominant approaches to mental health care have not resulted in a decrease in rates of mental illness. Moreover, evidence of the dangers, adverse reactions, and side effects of psychiatric medication is becoming more readily acknowledged both within and outside the medical community. As such, clients and clinicians alike are seeking alternatives to current mainstream models of care.

Alternatives to Psychotherapy and Medication

The active search for alternatives to conventional mental health care has led to the development of innovative approaches that have been used across a spectrum of conditions and problems. A key group in this work is the International Network Toward Alternatives and Recovery (INTAR). This group consists of clinicians, patients, and researchers who explore progressive models of care that are situated largely in communities rather than in traditional clinics or hospitals. The communities vary widely and include peer-support group housing and teams that respond to first-episode psychosis by entering the client's home and working closely and intensely with the client and his or her family and community members to avoid hospital-ization. These approaches follow the assumption that medication and psychotherapy serve to mask the underlying problems that stem from the person's environment. Emerging evidence indicates that these supportive alternatives can be highly successful in leading clients back into a daily life of well-being and positive functioning.

In her book The Myth of the Chemical Cure, psychiatrist Joanna Moncrieff outlines the risks of the mainstream psychiatric approach and argues that the current overreliance on psychiatric medication serves the interests of the psychiatric and pharmaceutical industries rather than the needs of clients. Similarly, psychologist Paula Caplan has been highly influential in raising awareness of the risks associated with psychiatric labeling and diagnosis. Caplan argues that psychiatric labels can be used to justify to clients and families the use of harmful medications and to provide courts with a rationale in custody and other cases to deny rights to those diagnosed as mentally ill. These critiques of mainstream psychiatry demonstrate clearly the risks of focusing solely on the client as the locus of change.

Empowerment Therapy

To Many clients and practitioners, the outright rejection of psychotherapy is both unrealistic and unnecessary. Therefore, psychotherapists have worked to develop models that are responsive to the critiques of those who maintain that alternatives are crucially needed. One of the more widely recognized models is the feminist empowerment therapy developed by Judith Worell and Pamela Remer. This model is highly useful not only for female clients but also for members of marginalized groups generally, including low-income clients and clients of color. The empowerment therapy approach assumes that stressful environments bring about psychological and emotional suffering that is often mistakenly framed solely as symptoms of mental illness. Worell and Remer argue that these “symptoms” should instead be viewed as manifestations of social ills that clients should be empowered to combat in their daily lives. Empowerment therapy thus contains tenets that focus on the development of individual empowerment as a means to create transformative, permanent changes in one's environment. These tenets include the belief that the interface between the personal and the political in the clients' lives must always be considered in therapy sessions such that prevailing social and political forces are critically examined as possible obstacles to psychological well-being. Another key tenet is the belief that the therapist must model an egalitarian relationship with the client; this modeling serves to encourage the client to adopt an empowered stance in taking on the task of social change.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading