Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Health communicators regularly mix qualitative and quantitative methods as they develop interventions. In fact, most versions of the health communication planning process explicitly call for mixed methods. Qualitative methods aim to gather an in-depth understanding of human behavior and the reasons that govern such behavior. The qualitative method investigates the why and how of decision making, not just what, where, and when. Hence, smaller but focused samples are needed more than large samples. Qualitative methods are usually smaller scale, low cost, and rapid. The data are expressed in words, not numbers. The qualitative methods also give the planner a chance to directly experience the intended audience. Specific types of qualitative research used by health communicators to develop interventions include in-depth interviews and focus groups.

Quantitative methods, on the other hand, use a formal, objective, systematic process in which numerical data are used to obtain information about the world. This research method describes variables, examines relationships among variables, and determines cause-and-effect interactions between variables. Samples are usually larger and are either selected randomly or randomized into groups following selection. Quantitative methods generally are used to evaluate the outcomes of an intervention. Specific types of quantitative methods include surveys, which are often administered before and after the intervention is implemented, behavioral observation by trained coders, and experiments, particularly field experiments.

Mixed Methods in Formative Evaluation

Most health communication processes are built on social marketing, a framework that emphasizes an audience-centered consumer orientation and strategies to attractively package the social product and use the optimum combination of campaign components that will achieve the pragmatic goals. The early stages of these processes are referred to as “formative evaluation” and attempt to understand the health problem; the audience's relevant knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors; any competition; and costs and benefits of the behaviors being promoted. Qualitative methods are often used at this formative stage and include key informant interviews, focus groups, and behavioral observation. At this stage, research helps identify intended audiences and focal behaviors, specify significant intermediate response variables, ascertain channel exposure patterns, and determine receptivity to potential message components.

Focus group sessions are conducted by a moderator who stimulates extensive, open-ended discussion of selected issues in a small group setting. Key informant interviews are in-depth interviews conducted with those who have unique knowledge of the intended audience, perhaps because they interact and/or observe them regularly. In-depth interviews may also be conducted with individuals from the intended audience, especially if the topics are very sensitive or the individuals difficult to recruit for focus groups. In the case of individually tailored messages, a unique form of formative research is used where the actual audience first completes an online survey instrument measuring numerous variables. The computer program then matches this individual assessment input with appropriate portions of content drawn from a database to create a tailored message that is then delivered on-screen or on printed pages.

Quantitative methods can also be used at this early stage in the planning process. Epidemiological databases are frequently consulted to describe the health problem or risk affects and what current behaviors are. Surveys such as the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES) or the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) are examples of sources for these data. It is not uncommon for these surveys to fail to include all the information the communication planner needs, so a formalized survey of midsize samples representing intended audience segments might be designed to measure a broad array of variables, usually via questionnaires. These quantitative results may serve as a pretest to be compared to the same survey administered after the intervention to assess effectiveness.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading