Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Researchers have consistently found that people are poor at detecting deception. One reason for this poor performance is the reliance on heuristics or simple decision rules when processing social interactions. Heuristics are mental shortcuts or rules of thumb based on experiences that often result in a quick and satisfactory outcome with minimal cognitive effort. One of these heuristics is the truth bias. The truth bias is the presumption of truth in interpersonal interactions and the tendency to judge an interpersonal message as truthful rather than deceptive, irrespective of the actual truth of the message. Communicators are initially assumed to be truthful, and this assumption is possibly revised only if something in the situation evokes suspicion. The truth bias is important for maintaining relationships and increasing intimacy because accusations of deception are damaging to relationships.

The truth bias is robust and widely documented by research involving people interacting with both friends and strangers. Although researchers have consistently found a strong truth bias in laboratory experiments, they have argued that the truth bias is probably even stronger in naturally occurring settings because simply asking people to make judgments about deception in a lab context may arouse suspicion and lower a person's natural truth bias. The truth bias also is stronger during face-to-face communication, when people are interacting with friends rather than strangers, and when people do not know that the experimental task involves detection of deception.

Cognitive heuristics like the truth bias are learned through experience or conventional beliefs. Relying on heuristics reduces cognitive effort and simplifies decision making; while heuristics can often lead to a correct decision or judgment, they can result in biases and faulty judgment. In the case of the truth bias, the large majority of naturally occurring interpersonal interactions are truthful, so reliance on the truth bias generally results in accurate judgment with minimal need to assess the interaction for deception.

Research on Truth Bias

Research has consistently found most people's level of lies in everyday interaction is very small (one to two lies daily), so heuristic use of a truth bias should result in high accuracy in determining truth of interactions with little cognitive effort. However, reliance on the truth bias results in faulty judgment when one accepts deception as truth without appraisal and analysis, and the use of the truth bias results in low accuracy in experiments in which only half the interactions are truthful.

The truth bias has often been measured in experimental designs in which the receiver of messages judges messages that are created with a 50/50 probability base rate of truths and lies. In this context, the truth bias is the tendency to judge over half the interactions as truths, and some researchers have argued that any tendency to judge over half the interactions as truth is a truth bias. However, others have suggested that truth bias depends on base rate. Therefore, if actual truths within a sample occur at a rate of 80 percent, then the truth bias would be any tendency to judge over 80 percent of interactions as truthful.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading