Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Power is the ability to influence others and is based in structural, cultural, or societal sources of power, such as one's class, sex, occupation, or position, or personal characteristics, such as charisma, social skills, poise, and dynamism. Leaders often possess these personal qualities as well as the structural sources of power, which gives them a great deal of influence over others. Leaders may use their power to deceive or may use deception as a tool in their persuasive repertoire more than those who lack the structural or personal sources of power. Research into deception and power has studied a variety of power relationships, including those in the workplace, educational settings, law enforcement, politics, and health care, among others.

Power should be differentiated from other related constructs such as dominance, leadership, authority, control, or influence. Generally, power is seen as the ability to exert influence on another person, but it is not always exercised in every situation. There are many different sources of power, including the legitimate status one has, the ability to reward or punish others, and the information or resources that one has access to. Powerful people do not always dominate others, because the situation or context determines what course of action is appropriate. In addition, having power in one context does not equate to power in all contexts because power is relationship and context dependent. Thus, when examining lying as an exercise of power, it must be examined with the context in mind in order to understand the motivations of deceivers and to understand what purpose their deception might serve.

Power is often associated with dominance and leadership, and some research suggests that deception is used differently by those on different rungs of the power ladder. Thus, powerful people may be more believable when they are lying not only because their status confers credibility but also because they look poised and confident when they are lying and have the social skills to weave deception and truth together. This combination of credibility and a skilled performance makes their deceptiveness very difficult to detect, especially when lies and truths are embedded together.

High-Power Versus Low-Power Individuals

It may also be seen as more acceptable for high-power individuals to lie than low-power individuals because they may have access to information the low-power parties do not. For example, it might be seen as permissible for an employer to avoid telling his or her employees about an upcoming merger or even lie about knowledge of the merger because of the legal ramifications associated with the secrecy of the deal. It may also be seen as more acceptable for a doctor to mislead a patient about the certainty of smoking-related health effects than for a patient to lie to the doctor about how many cigarettes he or she smokes. Of course, different cultures have different interpretations of lie acceptability as well as different understandings of power, and so the cultural context should always be considered when discussing power and the social acceptance of deception.

Deception is often used as a bargaining tactic, and the power position of the parties may determine what strategies are used during negotiations. For example, because deception is often seen as unethical, it might be reserved as a tactic of last resort or may be seen as permissible only when the ends justify the means. Some research suggests that the power level of the negotiator influences the type of deception that is employed. Most people equate deception with falsification, or deliberately creating misleading statements, but other kinds of deceptions, such as vagueness, exaggerations, concealments, or omissions, are also available strategies. Omissions are deceptions in which certain facts are concealed and tend to be used less often by high-power individuals than low-power individuals. Powerful people are also more likely to question the lies of others, especially low-power individuals, because they do not face the same chilling effect or fear of repercussions as those in low-power positions face.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading