Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Interpersonal deception theory (IDT) is a mid-range theory developed by David Buller and Judee Burgoon to predict and explain the process of encoding and decoding deceptive messages in interpersonal encounters. In response to what the authors perceived as an overly psychological orientation in the social science literature on deception, Buller and Burgoon created an interpersonal communication perspective on deception. Their theoretical framework articulates assumptions about interpersonal communication and deception and empirically testable propositions about deception as a communicative activity. The original articulation of IDT included a network of general and interrelated propositions from which hypotheses could be generated. These general statements are meant to be probabilistic, in light of the multiple and sometimes offsetting factors that influence a given deceptive episode. Subsequent descriptions and revisions by Buller and Burgoon further clarified and reworded the relationships specified by the propositions.

The scope of the theory is confined to interpersonal interactions and ones in which communicator credibility is salient. Self-delusion, role-playing, unwitting or inadvertent transmission of false information, discoveries of another's deceit outside interpersonal encounters, and nonhuman deception all fall outside the intended scope of the theory. As defined within IDT, deception refers to messages or signals knowingly and intentionally transmitted to foster a false belief or conclusion by another. The emphasis on messages does not deny that humans and other species mislead conspecifics in myriad noncommunicative actions nor that regularities gleaned from noncommunicative actions and nonhuman signals may help inform the causal mechanisms undergirding interpersonal deception.

Assumptions of IDT

Whereas many theories about deception focus on what an individual experiences or expresses, IDT as a communication theory emphasizes what happens between people rather than within people. Among the central communication-relevant assumptions of IDT are that communication is an interdependent activity and that both sender and receiver are active parties to the construction of deceptive interchanges. Interdependence implies that receivers influence sender cognitions and behavior, and vice versa, making deceptive signals not just the product of what the sender is experiencing but also how an interlocutor's communication affects the sender. Receivers also are not passive recipients of whatever signals are expressed by senders but instead play an active role, such that their emotions, cognitions, and communication warrant as much attention as those of senders. Receiver suspicion is an important factor when analyzing deceptive exchanges.

Another assumption is that, like other forms of communication, deception and its detection are goal-driven and often strategic (deliberate); deceivers and receivers act to accomplish such goals as protecting self, fostering a favorable image, preserving the interpersonal relationship, creating a comfortable interaction, or achieving instrumental aims. Deceiver and receiver's verbal and nonverbal communication reflect strategies and tactics to achieve those ends, even though like other intentional but routinized communicative acts, they may be “run off” without much conscious awareness.

Telling ingratiating white lies is an example of deceit that is produced easily and satisfies multiple communication goals, from preserving the relationship and saving another's face to promoting liking. Receivers may similarly enact covert and nonobvious strategies to ascertain a sender's truthfulness so as to minimize sullying the relationship with evident suspicion, or they may do the opposite, “ambushing” a sender with direct accusations to catch the person off guard and expose the truth. IDT assumes that many communication strategies and tactics are overlearned and performed relatively effortlessly. Deceit as a special case of interpersonal communication should therefore exhibit strategic activity.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading