Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

False advertising, like many other forms of lying and deception, can involve the exaggeration of an item's characteristics. False advertising, however, goes beyond mere exaggeration, and often involves the intentional misrepresentation of a product for the purpose of financial gain.

Dating back to biblical times, deceiving a buyer by misrepresentation in furtherance of a sale is not a new concept. Statutory protection from such deception in the United States today only dates back to the establishment of the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914. Most every state has enacted some form of legislation against unfair and deceptive trade practices. Additionally, the very nature of commercial speech to which advertising rules would apply only enjoys limited protection of freedom under the First Amendment, obscuring the line between allowable puffery and harmful misrepresentation, which may only be resolved in the courtroom.

False advertising encompasses not only the overt expression of an inaccurate material characteristic, but more often includes the omission of a product characteristic, which a consumer would find material to the purchase decision. The latter form of false advertising is the most complicated to regulate because it may be impossible to substantiate the intent to defraud on the part of the seller.

Federal and State Regulation

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is responsible in part for protecting consumers from unfair and deceptive practices, which are generally the result of improper advertising. The Bureau of Consumer Protection within the FTC is authorized to investigate and litigate cases that are alleged as deceptive or unfair to consumers. Important to note is that it is the Division of Marketing Practices within the Bureau of Competition of the FTC handles some aspects commonly thought of as directly related to consumers, such as fraudulent telemarketing schemes, 900-number programs, and franchise disclosures or business opportunities.

Despite inception of authority in 1914, it was not until the 1970s and pressure by consumer protection groups that the FTC took a more proactive role in regulating advertising and the misrepresentations so often causing harm. Further enactment of the Magnuson-Moss Act of 1975 and the establishment of restitution for damages exceeding a paltry $5 prompted the FTC to set the enforcement of laws regarding false or misleading advertising as a top priority. Additionally, the agency may levy civil penalties of up to $10,000 for each violation subsequent to an FTC order to cease and desist deceptive activities. The powers of the FTC as a federal agency are founded in interstate commerce, and as such, regulation and enforcement is limited when product vendors fall outside the classification of their jurisdiction.

False advertising and misleading representations for commercial enterprise is also regulated by several other federal agencies having more direct jurisdiction over the subject matter of the goods or service promoted. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was founded in 1934 to regulate broadcast communications, now encompassing radio, television, telephone, and telegraph industries, as well as more recent Internet and cable/satellite communications. While the FCC's primary means of control over false advertising is through the issuance or denial of licensure to broadcast, the power to purge improper ads also exists; close working relations with the FTC are maintained for litigious, prosecutorial measures.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading