Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

It is often said that the eyes are the windows to one's soul. In 1905, Sigmund Freud stated, “He that has eyes to see and ears to hear may convince himself that no mortal can keep a secret. If his lips are silent, he chatters with his fingertips. Betrayal oozes out of him at every pore.” Researchers over the decades have documented that nonverbal behavior carries much communicative power, providing meaning during interpersonal communication. The eyes and the surrounding muscles play a huge role in providing meaning when communicating. It is believed that up to 55 percent of meaning comes from the eyes. Studies over the years have shown that eye contact during a typical conversation ranges from 30 to 60 percent, with longer eye contact indicating stronger interest in either the person or the topic. It is normal as adults to regularly scan interactional partners' eye behavior to receive important information about mood, mental state, confidence, dominance, and credibility. Meaning is conveyed through nonverbal behaviors, including facial expressions and eye contact.

Researchers and practitioners have been interested in the role that eye contact plays in detecting lies for decades. According to Aldert Vrij, a leading deception researcher, to date there is no evidence linking eye contact and eye behaviors to deception. However, there are several theories of deception that incorporate the role of the eyes in lying during interaction. M. Zuckerman's four-factor model of deception, B. M. DePaulo and S. E. Kirkendol's motivational impairment effect, and D. B. Buller and J. K. Burgoon's interpersonal deception theory all include eye behaviors when explaining deception.

Four-Factor Model of Deception

Zuckerman and his colleagues developed the four-factor model of deception, which states that when people tell lies, there are four underlying mechanisms at work: arousal, control, emotions, and cognitive factors. By studying visual, paralin-guistic, and verbal cues, Zuckerman and others have identified how and when some behaviors are associated with deception.

Arousal includes both the psychological and physical arousal thought to be caused by an act of deception. When a person lies, his or her arousal is increased. This can be seen by an increase in pupil dilation and a reduction in blinking. The second factor, control, refers to the attempt made by liars to control the way in which deceit is leaked by nonverbal cues. This is often called “leakage.” Research over the years has revealed that facial expressions are the least revealing because people are better at controlling their facial expressions. The third factor offered by Zuckerman is emotion. Deception is a complex emotional phenomenon, which is made up of several emotions. When someone lies, his or her emotions change over the course of the deception. Micromotions in facial muscles can betray hidden emotions, which may affect the eyes. The final factor identified is cognitive factors, or thinking. One's thinking pattern changes when lying, and in order to remain coherent, more cognitive effort is required. Zuckerman and colleagues found that changes in cognitive effort influences speech patterns, which can alter pupil dilation; pupil dilation is one sign of deception.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading