Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The discovery of deception is generally presumed to be an intense, negative, emotional experience. In the classic novel The Count of Monte Cristo, for example, when Dantes deduces that his imprisonment is due to the lies of people he considered friends and allies, his response is such an all-consuming anger that he swears (and subsequently pursues) unfettered vengeance against his antagonists. Such a reaction is not limited to historical literature. Tales of violent reprisals in the wake of discovered deception dominate theatrical storylines, television shows, and real-world headlines.

The presumption of a negative reaction to discovered deception is not surprising when one considers the cognitive, relational, and emotional disruption that such events should evoke. Consider cognition: As Charles R. Berger and Richard J. Calabrese described four decades ago in their uncertainty reduction theory, people place great importance on believing that others are predictable and explainable. When people behave in ways that defy such beliefs (such as when deception is discovered), enormous anxiety ensues. This uncertainty centers around two dilemmas that dovetail with a lost sense of predictive and explanatory power: “How did I not see this coming?” and “Why did this happen to me?”

On the relational side, individuals in close involvements typically believe that they understand their partners, that their partners would never lie to them, and that if their partners did lie to them, they would be able to tell. Discovery of deception directly compromises all three of these convictions; hence, it is a devastating relationship event.

In addition, modern theories of emotion posit that intensity of affective experience directly corresponds to the degree to which events are interruptive of organized action sequences that guide individuals' daily behaviors, as well as higher-order goals and plans. Discovery of deception constitutes a radically interruptive event; consequently, it is intensely emotional.

Studies of Reactions to Discovered Deception

Because of the degree to which discovered deception is a dominant historical and narrative theme, and the intensity of cognitive, relational, and emotional disruption that occurs in its wake, it is surprising that it has received comparatively scant empirical attention from scholars. In fact, only a handful of studies have directly or indirectly examined this important topic.

One of the first noteworthy commentaries on discovered deception was offered by philosopher Sisela Bok in her seminal work, Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. She describes how individuals, upon discovering that they have been lied to, “are resentful, disappointed, suspicious. They feel wronged; they are wary of new overtures.” Soon thereafter, communication scholar Dale Hample examined liars' self-reported consequences for having lied; he noted that because the social costs associated with discovery were high, liars will typically only lie when they feel that the rewards are certain and sizable.

Subsequent to Hample's work, Sally Planalp and Jim Honeycutt explored uncertainty-increasing events, and their data underscored the indelible link between uncertainty and discovered deception. Planalp and Honeycutt surveyed 103 respondents, asking them to describe in detail an event “in which they learned something surprising about a friend, spouse, or romantic partner, and that information led them to question something basic to their relationship.” They then examined the impact of such events on four outcomes: relationship beliefs, emotional effects, communication, and relationship consequences.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading