Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

In order to charge a person with lying, it must be shown that the person knows what is true and intentionally covered up the truth. This act of covering up is the act of deception. Lying and deception are therefore different than misunderstanding or miscommunication. Much of what is called a lie in a dispute between persons or groups might in reality be the result of misunderstanding or miscommunication. In order to avoid incorrectly labeling another as a liar, it is necessary to understand the context of his statements or actions. To understand the context is to understand that which is “within the text,” or the setting in which the text occurs.

While lying is generally taken to be a positive action wherein a person makes a statement that he knows is not true, and therefore can also be said to know the truth, there can also be a negative condition of lying. A kind of culpable ignorance occurs when a person makes a false statement that he does not believe to be true, but also does not know what is true. In such a situation, the person states what he believes to be false, but what he believes to be true is also mistaken, yet he is responsible for this ignorance. This kind of ignorance can be called culpable ignorance, and a person is culpably ignorant when he does not know what is clear. To use a metaphor from vision, such a person must close his eyes to avoid what is clear; or more pointedly, such a person must deny his rationality to avoid knowing what he should know. This kind of culpability is especially important in considering the levels of context.

Seven Layers of Context

The first factor in determining if a person has lied, and in establishing a context for the lie, is meaning. When a person tells a lie, that person is making a statement that he does not believe to be true. However, in labeling someone a liar, it must first be determined whether or not there has been a misunderstanding, whether or not the person's meaning was grasped.

Meaning is more basic than truth in that if individuals do not know what a person means, they cannot determine if that person is telling the truth. The goal of establishing context is first and fundamentally to understand meaning. At the narrower levels of context, meaning is only partially grasped, and therefore there remain difficulties in correctly assigning truth or falsehood. Ambiguity remains at narrower levels of context, and is clarified as more context is given.

The narrowest sense of context is the most popular sense because it is at this level, or perhaps the next level, that most examinations of context end. This first level is the meaning of a given term. Because words, as conventional signs, can be used to communicate more than one concept, they can be ambiguous. This ambiguity can lead to misunderstanding or miscommunication. Specifying the exact concept expressed by a word sometimes requires the next level, which is to take note of the word's placement in a sentence. The grammatical structure of a sentence can sometimes help narrow down the meaning of a word. Nevertheless, neither of these levels rules out all ambiguity, and in the case of interpreting texts, there are many disputes about meaning, even when these two levels are carefully identified.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading