Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The juxtaposition of Christopher Columbus's name with lying and deception is ambivalent. The focus can be on the lies that have been told about Columbus, or on the lies that Columbus told. Among the many untruths written in history books is that of Columbus as the discoverer of America, and not even Columbus, who turned out to be quite a deceptive figure, even dreamed of playing that role. In fact, the lies that Columbus told are much more interesting and still warrant careful examination.

Initially, there appeared to be a wholesome effort at truthfulness. Christopher Columbus had succeeded at selling his project to the Spanish Crown, finding a more direct route to the Indies, and finding gold. A journal would be kept of this voyage. Thus, it is with the verb “to write” that Columbus refers in the journal to his expedition: “… I thought of writing on this whole voyage, all that I would do and see and experience …”

Admiral Columbus needed to write about this journey, for the journey could not be justified without the writing, and the writing was there to make up for the absence of the sovereigns of Spain who had funded the journey. Queen Isabella and King Ferdinand needed to be convinced that their money was well spent. The act of writing in the journal was therefore tied to an effort to gain and share knowledge and understanding of what lay beyond the rim of the horizon, to unveil the ocean's secret, which was an unrecognizable object, the New World. Soon enough, truthfulness and accuracy would become impossibilities.

The Need to Lie

Uncertainty led to a need for two journals: one that told the truth, and one that veiled reality. The crew needed to go about daily life onboard, goaded by the promise of future wealth and perhaps even renown. Any intimation that this enterprise could perhaps fail, any hint that they could possibly be navigating toward their doom, had to be quickly crushed. Hence, the lies: The number of knots traveled was rethought every night so that the crew would continue believing that land lay ahead, and that they had not traveled that far without reaching land. As the days passed, the more urgent it became to reassure the crew that they had not traveled that far. This initial, internal deception explains the difficulties in determining for sure where Columbus first made landfall.

Time and circumstance have given many dimensions to Columbus's journal that can be approached as a diary, a letter or the rough draft to a letter, a journal, and, once it was transcribed by Bartolomé de Las Casas, as a diary, a letter, and a journal written in different persons. In the beginning, the text is in the first person, but soon the “I” becomes “he,” and remains that way until October 13. Moreover, having “he/that” alternating with the “I” not only is an attempt to put words to the landscape but also talks to them (the sovereigns) and tries to justify this landscape.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading