Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The detection of cold fusion reactions was made public on March 23, 1989, by Stanley Pons, professor of chemistry, and Martin Fleischmann, professor of electrochemistry, of the University of Utah at a press conference prior to publication of a rushed technical article. Historically, there had been earlier claims of cold fusion discoveries in the 1920s and 1930s, but none of these could be reliably demonstrated or replicated.

Cold fusion as envisioned by the Pons and Fleischmann experiments has been relegated to a level of pathological science, pseudoscience, or voodoo science, whereby belief and research in the topic are fraught with unsubstantiated evidence. The researchers' self-deceptions were caused and perpetuated by the initial meteoric media frenzy and subsequent professional pressures.

Cold fusion is a type of nuclear reaction that can occur at low temperatures, such as room temperature, yet generates high levels of energy, with more energy produced than consumed in the reaction. Currently, there is no unequivocal science that supports an operative cold fusion reaction. Cold fusion reactions seemingly violate laws of thermodynamics, which suggest that a physical closed system (such as a cold fusion reaction) cannot continue to generate energy without exhausting itself or reaching entropy. Cold fusion may be contrasted with “hot” fusion reactions, which occur well into the million-degree mark (the sun is an example of a fusion reaction, as is a hydrogen bomb explosion), and the more familiar nuclear fission reactions from which nuclear power is generated.

Why the drive and fascination for cold fusion reactions? The attractive features of these reactions are that the required fuels are easily obtainable or created, the byproducts are low on pollutants, and radioactive waste is short-lived. Therefore, to discover a viable cold fusion reaction would make the creation of energy extremely efficient, inexpensive, and resulting in few, if any, dangerous byproducts.

Flawed Research

What role did deception and lies play in the cold fusion research of the late 1980s? Initially, Pons and Fleischmann unknowingly had methodological flaws in their experiments, so they believed in their findings. This in and of itself is not deception; methodological flaws do sometimes occur in any scientific research field. However, such mistakes are discovered during the article-writing phase by researchers, or during the peer-review phase prior to scientific publication. Because of competing research at Brigham Young University that was poised for release by another researcher, the University of Utah held a press conference, with Pons and Fleischmann releasing their findings prior to publication of a less than scientifically rigorous article. Coupled with a slow news cycle, a torrent of news stories ensued, and within a few weeks announcements by additional scientists from respected institutions noted similar cold fusion reaction findings (ultimately, these were also found to have methodological problems). Grant money was also provided to Pons and Fleischmann within the initial weeks after the University of Utah's press conference.

Thus, Pons and Fleischmann's research findings were initially supported by other researchers, hailed in the media, and rewarded through grant money. By the time other academics, elite academic research institutions, and a better informed media (for example, the Los Angeles Times and the New York Times) began questioning the findings, the cold fusion effect as reported by the researchers had become reified. Selfdeception for these researchers, driven by the positive reinforcement after the announcement and fear of public and academic embarrassment, was now evident. For Pons and Fleischmann to simply state “we made an error” was not seen as an option.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading