Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The plot to kill King Charles II of England (also known as the Popish Plot) was supposedly a plan to kill the king and replace him with his Roman Catholic brother James, the Duke of York. Although there was no plot, many people believed the story.

In the year prior to the plot, English public opinion was inclined to believe anti-Catholic rhetoric. Many Londoners had blamed the Catholics for the Great Fire of 1666. The fire, which lasted from September 2 to 5, destroyed much of the city, forcing many Londoners to evacuate. Robert Hubert, a French Catholic, confessed to having started the fire, even though he did not actually arrive in the country until two days after the fire started.

Despite the questionable nature of Hubert's claim that he was a French spy in service of the pope, the Frenchman was convicted and executed because it suited the needs of those in Parliament who believed that Charles II was sympathetic to Catholics. Catholics, who constituted less than 10 percent of England's population, became convenient scapegoats for all of the country's ills, so a claim that Catholics were behind a plot to kill the monarch had a receptive audience.

The plot was the creation of Titus Oates, an Anglican priest who had become a Catholic in 1677. He entered Jesuit seminaries, but was expelled from the seminary in St. Omer in France in June 1678. After his expulsion, Oates returned to England, where he shared with Dr. Israel Tonge his stories of plots by Jesuits, including the plot to kill the English monarch.

Catholic Scapegoats

Tonge and Oates wrote a manuscript detailing the Catholic conspiracy against the king. They claimed that the leaders of the Catholic Church in Great Britain had approved the assassination plot, which was to be carried out by the Jesuits. Allegedly, the English Catholics had entered into a conspiracy with King Louis XIV of France to raise an army of 50,000 men who would seize the country and kill the king, place his brother (who was Catholic) on the throne, and murder thousands of Protestants. No such plot existed, but Oates's story was readily accepted by English Protestants who feared the possibility of James, the Duke of York and a Roman Catholic, ascending to the throne if his brother died. Charles II had himself become a Catholic in 1670, but kept this a secret.

The king was informed of the plot by Christopher Kirkby, a chemist, and Tonge. Charles II, who did not really take the plot seriously, turned the investigation over to Thomas Osborne, Lord Danby, the lord high treasurer. Osborne was an opponent of the Roman Catholic Church in Great Britain, having opposed Charles II's 1672 Royal Declaration of Indulgence, which suspended criminal sanctions against those who did not conform to the Church of England or were Roman Catholics. Osborne also was a supporter of the 1673 Test Act, which barred nonconformists and Roman Catholics from public service or public office. Unlike the king, Osborne was interested in pursuing the plot. Tonge decided to have Oates tell his story, under oath, to Sir Edmund Geoffrey, a magistrate. Oates testified before Geoffrey on September 6, 1678. On October 12, the magistrate disappeared, and his body was found a few days later, which only heightened the belief that Oates's story had some merit and that the Jesuits had killed him to insure his silence.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading