Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

A great deal of research has been directed toward a better appreciation of how the brain operates when people engage in deception. Such research may be applied to the development of lie detection technology, but a thriving field of academic inquiry, the cognitive neuroscience of deception, has been making important progress in illuminating the processes by which deception is enacted at a neural level. This complex question has been addressed by a number of scientific disciplines, and convergent lines of research have included (but are by no means limited to) analysis of deceptive behavior in animals, developmental trajectories of deceptive behavior in children, loss of function and pathological studies of human adults, and more recently, psychophysiological and neuroimaging techniques.

Deception is a common feature of communication within human groups, but it is also a common feature of social interaction in nonhuman species. Reviews of deceptive behavior in animals illustrate a number of levels at which deception may be observed and that animals mislead, bluff, and deceive with a range of objectives and levels of sophistication or complexity.

By examining the brains of different species and the ways in which they live and breed together, a startling relationship is found between the average size of a social group and the size of the brain. Specifically, the bigger the social group, the bigger the brain. The “Machiavellian intelligence” or “social brain” hypothesis puts forward the idea that the comparatively large brains and complex cognitive abilities of humans have evolved as a result of intense social competition. It is suggested that earlier on in the human evolutionary lineage, some individuals may have developed increasingly sophisticated Machiavellian or manipulative and deceitful interaction strategies in order to obtain heightened social position and reproductive success, resulting in a developmental arms race.

Prefrontal Cortex and Deception

In an extensive survey of trained animal observers in which a number of possible confounding factors were considered, it was discovered that, as both cortical volume and specifically the relative size of the prefrontal cortex in comparison to the rest of the brain increases, the frequency and complexity of reported episodes of tactical deception increases. The prefrontal cortex, which is directly behind the forehead, is strongly linked in humans with language, memory, planning, the control of automatic behavior, and the representation of the minds of other individuals. These processes are all strongly implicated in deception, a finding that more recent neuroimaging studies appear to support.

The role of the prefrontal cortex, and especially areas of the prefrontal cortex supporting the representation of the minds of others (known as theory of mind), is also supported by developmental research. Children are unable to understand or make use of deception prior to a certain point in their cognitive development, usually indicated as around the same time as the development of the fully fledged theory of mind. This includes the understanding that others can have false beliefs, or beliefs that are inconsistent with one's beliefs and may be crucially inconsistent with the true state of the world. Several strands of neurobiological research have shown this period of development to promote rapid development of the prefrontal cortices in children, which have been shown to be crucial for theory of mind, false-belief understanding, and deception.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading