Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Spaceflight

Still in its infancy, spaceflight is a high-risk endeavor that is constantly evolving and experiences leaps and setbacks. Although it is considered experimental flight by some, the broad tax-paying publics of many nations show little tolerance for the failures, deaths, and setbacks associated with spaceflight. Critics often will ask whether time, effort, and money devoted to spaceflight might be put toward social projects. Two well-known U.S. spaceflight crises have contributed to an increasingly negative public perception of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and allowed some to question the agency's ability to perform its mission successfully.

Challenger and Columbia

The space shuttle Challenger and Columbia disasters were involved in the two major spaceflight accidents in U.S. history. These missions not only caused astronaut fatalities but also raised worldwide concerns for engineering crisis prevention and decision management.

On January 28, 1986, the space shuttle Challenger, on Mission STS-51-L operated by NASA (the 25th flight of the American space shuttle program and the 10th flight of the Challenger), broke apart 73 seconds after liftoff from Kennedy Space Center in Florida. All seven crew members died as a result of inadequate escape systems after the explosion, including Christa McAuliffe, a celebrity as the first astronaut of the NASA Teacher in Space Project. The launch was broadcast live and drew significant nationwide attention. This disaster caused the first multiple in-flight fatalities in the United States, leading to the suspension of the shuttle program for 32 months.

Then-U.S. President Ronald Reagan appointed the Rogers Commission to investigate the accident. Analysis showed the technical attribution to a faulty O-ring sealing the aft field joint on the right solid rocket booster (SRB). The cold weather, with a temperature below 53 degrees F (12 degrees C) on the launch day, caused the dysfunction of the O-rings, which allowed pressurized hot gases to leak from the SRBs, resulting in the structural failure of the external tank and the disintegration of the entire vehicle. The investigation further pointed out the flawed organizational culture and decision-making processes of NASA as the root of the disaster and made nine recommendations for safety improvements in the space shuttle program. In response to the recommendations, NASA redesigned the SRB and established the Office of Safety Reliability and Quality Assurance for management decision making. However, the space shuttle Columbia disaster in 2003 reflected that NASA had failed to fully learn from the Challenger.

As the second space shuttle NASA had lost in 17 years, Columbia disintegrated during atmospheric reentry after the 16-day Mission STS-107 (the 28th flight of the shuttle program) on February 1, 2003. The loss of communication and tracking of the vehicle occurred 16 minutes before scheduled landing at an altitude of about 203,000 feet over Texas and Louisiana. No survivors were found among the seven astronauts on board. According to the Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB), the catastrophe was rooted in both technical and organizational issues. The structural breakup was determined to have been caused by the damage of the thermal protection system in the left wing; the leading edge of the left wing was struck by a briefcase-sized piece of foam insulating material from the external tank early in the launch, which, however, NASA ignored for further inspection. This disaster delayed the space shuttle flight operations for over two years, including the construction of the International Space Station. Both of the space shuttle disasters were criticized for the flawed decision-making process.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading