Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The concept of protection at the most basic level relates to issues around dignity, safety, human rights, and the international humanitarian legal framework for addressing the survival needs of refugees, asylum seekers, children, and other such “persons of concern.” “Person of concern” refers to an individual who for other reasons has approximately similar situation and experiences to those of asylum seekers, for example, stateless people and internally displaced persons.

The nature of contemporary crises and disasters necessitates that a range of actors meet their international legal obligations and accept accountability for their actions with regard to vulnerable people under their jurisdiction or control. Trends at the beginning of the 21st century seem to indicate a slight decline in the number of refugees internationally. However, there has been a notable rise in the number of displaced people at a global level, and chronic problems relating to protection of refugees and other people of concern have become more complex than would have been envisaged only half a century ago.

History of Protection and Crisis

Problems relating to refugee protection have a long history. Prior to the formation of the United Nations and its agencies, refugees and other people of concern encountered suppression of their basic human rights in some host countries where they had fled to claim asylum, or they experienced generally less favorable treatment than citizens of those countries. Arbitrary and disparate initiatives that were pursued by some nations and groups in the first half of the 20th century often had major shortcomings.

During the period between 1921 and the 1950s, when the first serious consideration of refugees occurred, the policy was characterized by reactive rather than proactive approaches to refugee crisis and problems worldwide. During the three decades following World War I, ineffective mechanisms and lack of readily accessible guidance and relevant skills for dealing with issues relating to protection were commonplace.

The 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees constitutes the key legal document in regard to the legal obligations of states and the basic rights of refugees. Being signatories to and compliant with the 1951 Refugee Convention and, in some cases, the Organization of African Unity (OAU) 1967 protocol, had initially been an attractive course of action for states to pursue during the few decades up to the end of the 20th century. A combination of factors, including conflicts, wars, globalization, improved air and land communication, and in certain cases a search for improved economic conditions by working-age sections of populations, particularly from developing countries, seemed to present new crises in relation to migration.

Toward the end of the 20th century and most certainly at the beginning of the 21st century, there has been a notable shift in the position of states as they face asylum crisis. As a reaction, there have been, for example, controversial interceptions of would-be asylum claimants in international waters offshore Australia, and the European Union (EU) states of Spain and Malta, and also in the United States. Instruments such as the 1951 Refugee Convention, which was designed to address this situation, are consistently coming under question as hosting states attempt to deal quickly with sudden surges in migration.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading