Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The use of the term conscientious objection typically refers to a person who refuses on religious or moral grounds to participate in a mandated professional activity or duty, such as a pharmacist who refuses to issue a prescription for a morning-after pill or a draftee who resists required military service. Conscientious objection may be a legal violation motivated by the individual's belief that he or she is morally prohibited from following such law, usually because the law itself is considered wrong in some way. However, the resistance may not rise to the level of a legal violation, such as when conscientious refusal is written into the law as a justifiable exception to the rule.

For instance, religious exceptions to medical interventions are allowed under law, often with a signed waiver, as with parents who refuse lifesaving surgery or blood transfusion for a child due to religious beliefs. Conscientious objection, which is typically an individual belief-motivated act of resistance, differs somewhat from civil disobedience, which tends toward drawing public attention to willingness to break the law in the pursuit of social justice. In the criminal justice system, individuals sometimes interact with police and other justice officials in ways that show their non-cooperation or collective resistance, and these can demonstrate ethical concerns with particular criminal justice policy or practice.

In the area of criminal justice, ethical debates surrounding policing and correctional practices demonstrate individuals who act, often in nonviolent ways, to resist police and correctional authority or policy, and occasionally to express particular oppositional beliefs symbolically. These individuals in justice settings can be considered conscientious objectors to particular justice officials or criminal justice practices. Sometimes conscientious objection is an act of last resort, in which other more conventional challenges to authority have been exhausted or otherwise are closed off as options for the individual. Conscientious objection is an act of resistance, as individuals without power or authority attempt to voice their concerns in ways that question the potentially unlawful or inhumane practice of those with power.

Conscientious Objection to Policing: Resisting Arrest and Unlawful Arrest

Previous research considered the influence of a suspect's demeanor on police behavior, with attention to physical resistance and verbal disrespect either as an illegal act or as an affront to authority. Resistance to an arrest may also capture conscientious objection in that the noncompliance stems from a person's own beliefs in conflict with the law, or from a belief that the arrest is unlawful and, thus, the police behavior is questioned. Political activists motivated by belief in a cause may engage in criminal activity as a strategy to disrupt organizations thought to be the source of problematic conditions. Therefore, the resistance of police action or arrest is a form of political expression that might be considered conscientious objection or civil disobedience.

Political expression by activists increasingly is controlled by police with a territorial strategy, in which there is legal restriction of public demonstrations to certain locations. These practices are well documented in examples such as the 1999 protests in Seattle against the World Trade Organization (WTO) conference, and the 2011 Occupy Movement protests. These protesters as conscientious objectors challenge the very police practices designed to keep order and resist the legitimacy and authority of police. While police restriction on protest territory has been upheld as a constitutional means of maintaining public order, there are those who resist this space restriction as an attempt to restrict freedom of speech. Activists and police negotiate about protest time, place, and nature of the activity to occur. There has been increased militaristic tactical response to dissenters by police, as well as during natural disaster response, thus creating a blurring between military and police agents.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading