Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Wickersham Commission
The Wickersham Commission’s 1931 report on the criminal justice system was a landmark event in American policing. President Herbert Hoover appointed the commission to, among other things, address the many problems with Prohibition enforcement. But the commission’s work led its members to explore other issues in the American criminal justice system, and some of their findings and recommendations shocked the nation and law enforcement professionals. Of particular importance were the commission’s reports on policing and the lawlessness of law enforcement, the latter exposing primarily police brutality and corruption. While the commission’s reports did not immediately result in reforms, some of the findings and recommendations provided philosophical and operational precursors for community policing as we know it today. This entry provides a history of the commission, information about its two reports on policing, and the effect of those reports on community policing.
History of the Commission
President Hoover appointed the National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement in May 1929, not only when law enforcement agencies were failing at enforcing Prohibition, but also when the criminal laws regulating alcohol had created a whole host of new outlaws who were manufacturing and distributing forbidden beer and spirits. Law enforcement agencies were dealing with a broad spectrum of Prohibition-related criminals, from backyard moonshiners to sophisticated organized crime gangs in Chicago and New York. Overall crime rates were also on the rise and Hoover believed the time had come to scientifically study crime and the criminal justice system.
Hoover was likely influenced by the use of scientific commissions on the municipal level beginning in the early 1920s. Following the Chicago (Illinois) Crime Commission in 1919, the Cleveland (Ohio) Survey in 1922 was the first commission to apply a scientific approach to investigate all aspects of crime and the municipal criminal justice system (and would later provide the model for the Wickersham Commission’s membership, scope of inquiry, and report generation). The Missouri Crime Survey did the same in 1926, broadening the review to include state corrections and county sheriff’s departments. Then, beginning in 1929, the Wickersham Commission began examining an even broader scope of issues at the national level.
The commission was named for its chair, George W. Wickersham, former U.S. attorney general under President William Taft. Its 10 other appointees were all drawn from positions in law and politics: Roscoe Pound, dean of Harvard Law School; Newton D. Baker, former secretary of war under President Woodrow Wilson; Ada Comstock, president of Radcliffe College; Frank Loesch, Chicago attorney and leader of the Chicago Crime Commission (noted for his work in prosecuting Al Capone); attorney Henry W. Anderson; William I. Grubb, U.S. District Court judge (Northern Alabama); former U.S. senator and circuit court of appeals judge William S. Kenyon; New Orleans attorney Monte M. Lehman; former chief judge of the Washington Supreme Court, Kenneth Mackintosh; and Paul J. McCormick, U.S. District Court judge (Southern California).
The commission’s scope of inquiry was unprecedented. It investigated the three major components of the criminal justice system—law enforcement, the courts, and corrections—but also examined issues like criminal statistics, prosecution, deportation enforcement, juvenile offenders, federal courts, criminal procedure, crime and the “foreign born,” and the costs and causes of crime. In January 1931, the commission issued its findings in 14 volumes, with titles such as Report on Prosecution, Report on Criminal Statistics, and Report on Penal Institutions, Probation and Parole.
...
- Changing Agency Culture
- Agency Mission and Values, Changes in
- Community Policing, Discretionary Authority Under
- Community Policing: Resources, Time, and Finances in Support of
- Customer-Based Policing
- Decentralizing the Organization/Organizational Change
- Implementation of Community Policing
- Involving Local Businesses
- Learning Organization
- Measuring Officer Performance
- Officers’ Job Satisfaction
- Publicity Campaigns
- Recruiting for Quality and Diversity
- Roles, Chief Executives’
- Roles, First-Line Supervisors’
- Roles, Middle Managers’
- Roles, Officers’
- Strategic Planning
- Crime Analysis: Technologies and Techniques
- Evaluation and Assessment
- Foundations: Evolution of Community Policing and Problem Solving
- Broken Windows Theory
- Building Partnerships and Stakeholders
- Citizen Patrols
- Collaboration With Outside Agencies
- Community Cohesion and Empowerment
- Community Justice
- Community Policing and Problem Solving, Definition of
- Community Policing, Evolution of
- Community Policing: What It Is Not
- Community Prosecution
- Community, Definition of
- Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design
- Directed Patrol, Studies of
- Evidence-Based Policing
- Fear of Crime
- Flint, Michigan, Experiment
- Foot Patrols
- Generations (Three) of Community Policing
- Intelligence-Led Policing
- International Community Policing
- Investigations, Community Policing Strategies for
- Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment
- Metropolitan Police Act of 1829
- Place-Based Policing
- Police Mission
- Police-Community Relations
- Policing, Three Eras of
- Predictive Policing
- Problem-Oriented Policing, Goldstein’s Development of
- Problem-Oriented Policing: Elements, Processes, Implications
- Problem-Solving Courts
- Problem-Solving Process (SARA)
- Problem, Definition of
- Restorative Justice
- Situational Crime Prevention
- Social Capital
- Team Policing
- Volunteers, Police Use of
- Wickersham Commission
- Future Considerations
- Public Safety Issues
- Supporting Legislation and National Organizations
- Center for Problem-Oriented Policing
- Community Oriented Policing Services, Office of
- Community Policing Consortium
- Executive Sessions on Policing
- Homeland Security
- National Center for Community Policing
- National Crime Prevention Council
- Neighborhood Associations
- Operation Weed and Seed
- Police Foundation
- Regional Community Policing Institutes
- Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994
- Training and Curriculum
- “What Works”—Selected Strategies and Initiatives
- Colleges and Universities, Community Policing Strategies for
- Domestic Violence, Community Policing Strategies for
- Drug Crimes, Community Policing Strategies for
- Elderly Victimization, Community Policing Strategies for
- Gang Crimes, Community Policing Strategies for
- Immigrant Populations, Community Policing Strategies for
- Immigration: Issues, Law, and Police Training
- Public Housing, Community Policing Strategies for
- Repeat Victimization, Community Policing Strategies for
- Rural Areas, Community Policing in
- School Violence and Safety, Community Policing Strategies for
- State Police/Patrol, Community Policing Strategies for
- Traffic Problems, Community Policing Strategies for
- Youthful Offenders, Community Policing Strategies for
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches