Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Implementation of Community Policing
The implementation of community policing is crucial to the eventual success and longevity of adopting the concept within a policing organization and the community it serves. When implementing community policing, one of the most important decisions police management make is the scope of change they want to undertake. If a more limited approach is preferred, implementation can be a simple, straightforward endeavor. However, if a more in-depth change is sought, implementation can become a complex three-stage process (pre-implementation, implementation, and post-implementation) involving many phases with concurrent internal and external foci. It requires an administrator who understands the department and the community it represents as well as the assets, strengths, weaknesses, limitations, and capacities of each entity. In essence, implementing community policing requires both strong management skills and well-honed leadership abilities. Furthermore, implementation requires specified knowledge of the phases of planned change, organizational behavior, underlying theoretical and conceptual principles, transformational leadership traits, and assessment of the process. In this entry, each of the three stages of implementation is discussed separately before being integrated to provide a complete picture of the complex community policing implementation process.
Pre-Implementation Stage
Successful implementation of organization-wide community policing begins far before the change is put into motion. The planning stage is crucial and time consuming, consisting of goal setting and the creation of a management foundation. While community policing in practice is often discussed as a bottom-up concept, implementation within a department is top-down, starting with an executive decision and the commitment to complete the process from inception to completion. Preimplementation begins by training all sworn and non-sworn personnel in the organization on community policing and problem solving, focusing on the underlying philosophies as well as strategies and practices. Furthermore, it requires identifying stakeholders within the organization and community that are most likely to support the idea as well as those that are most likely to resist. In this phase, police executives define what community policing means in their organization and community. This is done through internal (other administrators within the department, officers, and staff) and external (administrators in other agencies, community stakeholders, policymakers whose decisions impact police operations, and previous literature) communication. This early communication informally begins the implementation phase and primes the organization for the change that will soon take place.
If the original scope decision is for an organizationwide version of community policing, further preimplementation phases are required before the executives proceed. This is where theoretical and conceptual knowledge become paramount through reviewing previous literature and research, as does understanding the behavior of organizations going through change. In this phase, the executives must embrace the notion of innovation and beware of mimetic isomorphism (institutions in the same organizational field becoming similar through mimicking what other have done) without greater attention to their unique organizational history and community environment. Furthermore, research has found that community policing through the utilization of federal grants often becomes a form of coercive isomorphism—influencing departments that accept the grants to become the same in terms of structure or process. Thus, executives must be keenly aware of the pitfalls of isomorphism when planning the implementation of community policing and focus on innovative management methods to avoid the failures described and detailed in the community policing literature.
...
- Changing Agency Culture
- Agency Mission and Values, Changes in
- Community Policing, Discretionary Authority Under
- Community Policing: Resources, Time, and Finances in Support of
- Customer-Based Policing
- Decentralizing the Organization/Organizational Change
- Implementation of Community Policing
- Involving Local Businesses
- Learning Organization
- Measuring Officer Performance
- Officers’ Job Satisfaction
- Publicity Campaigns
- Recruiting for Quality and Diversity
- Roles, Chief Executives’
- Roles, First-Line Supervisors’
- Roles, Middle Managers’
- Roles, Officers’
- Strategic Planning
- Crime Analysis: Technologies and Techniques
- Evaluation and Assessment
- Foundations: Evolution of Community Policing and Problem Solving
- Broken Windows Theory
- Building Partnerships and Stakeholders
- Citizen Patrols
- Collaboration With Outside Agencies
- Community Cohesion and Empowerment
- Community Justice
- Community Policing and Problem Solving, Definition of
- Community Policing, Evolution of
- Community Policing: What It Is Not
- Community Prosecution
- Community, Definition of
- Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design
- Directed Patrol, Studies of
- Evidence-Based Policing
- Fear of Crime
- Flint, Michigan, Experiment
- Foot Patrols
- Generations (Three) of Community Policing
- Intelligence-Led Policing
- International Community Policing
- Investigations, Community Policing Strategies for
- Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment
- Metropolitan Police Act of 1829
- Place-Based Policing
- Police Mission
- Police-Community Relations
- Policing, Three Eras of
- Predictive Policing
- Problem-Oriented Policing, Goldstein’s Development of
- Problem-Oriented Policing: Elements, Processes, Implications
- Problem-Solving Courts
- Problem-Solving Process (SARA)
- Problem, Definition of
- Restorative Justice
- Situational Crime Prevention
- Social Capital
- Team Policing
- Volunteers, Police Use of
- Wickersham Commission
- Future Considerations
- Public Safety Issues
- Supporting Legislation and National Organizations
- Center for Problem-Oriented Policing
- Community Oriented Policing Services, Office of
- Community Policing Consortium
- Executive Sessions on Policing
- Homeland Security
- National Center for Community Policing
- National Crime Prevention Council
- Neighborhood Associations
- Operation Weed and Seed
- Police Foundation
- Regional Community Policing Institutes
- Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994
- Training and Curriculum
- “What Works”—Selected Strategies and Initiatives
- Colleges and Universities, Community Policing Strategies for
- Domestic Violence, Community Policing Strategies for
- Drug Crimes, Community Policing Strategies for
- Elderly Victimization, Community Policing Strategies for
- Gang Crimes, Community Policing Strategies for
- Immigrant Populations, Community Policing Strategies for
- Immigration: Issues, Law, and Police Training
- Public Housing, Community Policing Strategies for
- Repeat Victimization, Community Policing Strategies for
- Rural Areas, Community Policing in
- School Violence and Safety, Community Policing Strategies for
- State Police/Patrol, Community Policing Strategies for
- Traffic Problems, Community Policing Strategies for
- Youthful Offenders, Community Policing Strategies for
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches