Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Generations (Three) of Community Policing
Policing historians have identified three eras of U.S. policing. They consist of the political, reform, and community eras. The last era, in which community policing became a prominent policing approach, is said to span the years 1980 to present day. As this is a span of over 30 years, it tends to mask the subtle changes that have occurred during the community era. Policing in 2010 is assuredly different from policing in the 1990, despite both falling within the community policing era. Thus, police historians have further asserted that within the community era there have been three generations of community policing. They consist of the innovation generation covering 1980 to 1986, the diffusion generation spanning the years 1987 to 1994, and the institutionalization generation running from 1995 to the present. There is the possibility that U.S. policing has moved into a fourth generation or possibly even a fourth era, as the concepts of homeland security have become so pervasive in modern times.
The basis for categorizing policing history in the United States into eras was based on the changes seen in policing’s authorization, function, organizational design, relationship to the environment, the demand for its services, changes in tactics and technology, and the outcomes desired by both politicians and citizens. The first era, the political era, spans from 1838 and the creation of the Boston (Massachusetts) Police Department through the 1920s. Policing during the political era was marked by the political machines and their control over the police. Policing during this time period was ineffective, inefficient, mostly corrupt, and often brutal. That began to change in the 1920s with the movement to professionalize the police by such visionaries as August Vollmer and O. W. Wilson, thus moving policing into the reform era, which spanned the decades the 1930s through the 1970s. By the 1970s, however, policing had become so professionalized that it tended to disassociate itself from the community, and in the 1970s there was a movement to reunite the ties between the police and the public. The community era began in 1980 and continues to modern times.
While these three eras of policing are broad time periods for categorizing changes in U.S. policing, they tend to ignore the minor changes and developments that occurred within each era. There is an understanding among police historians that within the community era there has been a progression of community policing. This progression has been called the generations of community policing, and three have been distinguished: innovation, diffusion, and institutionalization. This entry discusses these three generations and examine whether community policing has evolved into the next generation.
First Generation: Innovation
The first generation of community policing commenced about 1980 and ran through 1986, and is known as the innovation generation. While there were some early pioneers working on the concepts of community policing in the late 1960s and 1970s, most of the early work fell under similar but differing concepts, such as police-community relations and team policing. Two major works influenced the innovation toward community policing during this generation. The first was James Q. Wilson and George L. Kelling’s broken windows theory in 1982, which posited that minor crimes and public disorder, if left unfixed, communicate that the community is not concerned about the problems, and thus attracts further crime in the community. The second was Herman Goldstein’s (1979) problem-oriented policing, which argued that police officers, wrongly, treat all calls as isolated incidents and that in reality many are of the crimes and disturbances to which they respond are linked by an underlying problem. By identifying the problem and developing possible solutions, police can implement a response to solve the problem.
...
- Changing Agency Culture
- Agency Mission and Values, Changes in
- Community Policing, Discretionary Authority Under
- Community Policing: Resources, Time, and Finances in Support of
- Customer-Based Policing
- Decentralizing the Organization/Organizational Change
- Implementation of Community Policing
- Involving Local Businesses
- Learning Organization
- Measuring Officer Performance
- Officers’ Job Satisfaction
- Publicity Campaigns
- Recruiting for Quality and Diversity
- Roles, Chief Executives’
- Roles, First-Line Supervisors’
- Roles, Middle Managers’
- Roles, Officers’
- Strategic Planning
- Crime Analysis: Technologies and Techniques
- Evaluation and Assessment
- Foundations: Evolution of Community Policing and Problem Solving
- Broken Windows Theory
- Building Partnerships and Stakeholders
- Citizen Patrols
- Collaboration With Outside Agencies
- Community Cohesion and Empowerment
- Community Justice
- Community Policing and Problem Solving, Definition of
- Community Policing, Evolution of
- Community Policing: What It Is Not
- Community Prosecution
- Community, Definition of
- Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design
- Directed Patrol, Studies of
- Evidence-Based Policing
- Fear of Crime
- Flint, Michigan, Experiment
- Foot Patrols
- Generations (Three) of Community Policing
- Intelligence-Led Policing
- International Community Policing
- Investigations, Community Policing Strategies for
- Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment
- Metropolitan Police Act of 1829
- Place-Based Policing
- Police Mission
- Police-Community Relations
- Policing, Three Eras of
- Predictive Policing
- Problem-Oriented Policing, Goldstein’s Development of
- Problem-Oriented Policing: Elements, Processes, Implications
- Problem-Solving Courts
- Problem-Solving Process (SARA)
- Problem, Definition of
- Restorative Justice
- Situational Crime Prevention
- Social Capital
- Team Policing
- Volunteers, Police Use of
- Wickersham Commission
- Future Considerations
- Public Safety Issues
- Supporting Legislation and National Organizations
- Center for Problem-Oriented Policing
- Community Oriented Policing Services, Office of
- Community Policing Consortium
- Executive Sessions on Policing
- Homeland Security
- National Center for Community Policing
- National Crime Prevention Council
- Neighborhood Associations
- Operation Weed and Seed
- Police Foundation
- Regional Community Policing Institutes
- Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994
- Training and Curriculum
- “What Works”—Selected Strategies and Initiatives
- Colleges and Universities, Community Policing Strategies for
- Domestic Violence, Community Policing Strategies for
- Drug Crimes, Community Policing Strategies for
- Elderly Victimization, Community Policing Strategies for
- Gang Crimes, Community Policing Strategies for
- Immigrant Populations, Community Policing Strategies for
- Immigration: Issues, Law, and Police Training
- Public Housing, Community Policing Strategies for
- Repeat Victimization, Community Policing Strategies for
- Rural Areas, Community Policing in
- School Violence and Safety, Community Policing Strategies for
- State Police/Patrol, Community Policing Strategies for
- Traffic Problems, Community Policing Strategies for
- Youthful Offenders, Community Policing Strategies for
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches