Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

In 1911, the American engineer and management consultant Fredrick Winslow Taylor published a tiny book called The Principles of Scientific Management. The book referred to the experiences Taylor had while conducting experiments on improving the efficiency of work processes in a steel company through so-called time studies. In retrospect, the book stands out as probably one of the most significant management books ever written and is the bible of the management ideology called ‘Taylorism’. By introducing a radical division of labour between managers and workers, this book is constitutive of our modern conception of the organization of working life. It has been a central point of reference for discussions and practices of management and organizing, both as a source of inspiration and, not least, as a target of critique. Although highly criticized from the beginning, the ideology still seems to diffuse in ever new practices and technical disguises (Business Process Re-Engineering, Lean Production, etc.). Thus, most approaches to management and organizing relate to this work in one way or another, explicitly or implicitly. This is also true of the branch of action research that addresses the management and organizing of working life, the industrial democracy tradition of action research. This entry expands on the concept and the impact of Taylorism in modern working life and outlines how the industrial democracy branch of action research has been developed as a reaction to Taylorism.

Basic Principles of Taylorism

The principles of scientific management (hereafter SM) according to Taylor (1998) can be summed up as follows:

  • A radical division of work between manager and worker, where the manager will have the full responsibility for developing and designing the procedures and the organization of the work processes, leaving the workers the task of enacting or implementing the work

The managers’ tasks will thus be to do the following:

  • Assess scientifically the best way to perform the tasks and outline them in a specific scheme of actions that can be distributed to a series of actors performing simple actions instead of complex ones
  • Select the best persons to perform the tasks according to scientific methods
  • Guide and train the workers to perform the tasks efficiently
  • Monitor the performance of the workers to ensure that the procedures are followed and the expected result achieved
  • Treat the workers as individuals—create systems of incentives and learning addressing the individual workers rather than the collectivity of workers

Taylor’s principles of management and organizing gained a lot of influence within industrial work from the early and mid twentieth century, associated with standardized mass production of, for instance, cars (so-called Fordism, even though many sources claim that Ford did not know about Taylor when he designed his first mass production factory). It has also contributed to the enlargement of bureaucracies, as systems of standardized and impersonalized routine processing and implementation of decisions.

What has been termed by Ritzer as McDonaldization of service work is basically Tayloristic in its management and organization. The concept of ‘lean operations’ that is currently mushrooming through both private and public sectors internationally is another example. By using expert observation and analyses as a basis for redesigning all kinds of tasks, from surgical operations at hospitals and care work within nursing homes to processing of insurance cases, these ‘lean’ strategies of change are typically Tayloristic. Specific management technologies like ‘balanced scorecard’, measuring specific performances and so on are often claimed to be practised in a Tayloristic

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading