Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Organization Development

The term organization development (commonly referred to as OD) refers to an approach to organizational change that is a philosophy, a professional field of social action, a mode of scientific inquiry and an array of techniques to enable change to take place in organizations. It is understood to be different from organizational development, the latter referring to the general development of organizations and paralleling terms like personal development and community development. OD is understood to refer to a specific values-based approach that has its roots in the work of Kurt Lewin and which is deeply imbedded in action research. Definitions of OD vary, but they tend to comprise the following elements in one form or other: that OD is a long-term effort whose aim is to improve an organization’s processes of renewing itself through envisioning its future, structuring itself appropriately and being able to solve problems. OD places special emphasis on an ongoing management of organizational culture, particularly in work teams and interdepartmental configurations. It may utilize an external OD consultant, who works in a facilitator role rather than an expert advisor role. This entry discusses the history and characteristics of OD, as well as interventions and OD’s core feature, action research.

History

OD does not comprise a single theory, and so its origins lie in many different strands of applied behavioural science—individual psychology, group dynamics, leadership, organization theory, human resource management and elements from sociology and anthropology. In some respects, OD builds on all the major developments of organization theory and the interface of organizations with the people who work in them. Some of the experiments and research which are more directly related to the emergence of OD as a distinctive approach to managing planned change are as follows: (a) the work of Kurt Lewin on re-education, planned change, field theory, the stages of change and action research and his seminal work on group dynamics, and, in particular, the emergence of T-groups; (b) the work of Eric Trist and his associates in the Tavistock Institute in the UK on coal mining in Durham, which led to an understanding of how technology and people are interdependent and how organizations are sociotechnical systems; (c) the client-centred approach to helping individuals make their own personal change pioneered by Carl Rogers and (d) the approaches to surveying organizations developed by Rensis Likert and his colleagues in Michigan.

Much of the development of OD came out of Lewin’s discovery that attention to ‘here-and-now’ processes in a group provides a powerful vehicle for learning about groups. This insight was formalized in the T-group (‘T’ stands for training), which is an unstructured group led by a trainer who works in a non-directive manner. T-groups were organized by the National Training Laboratories (later the NTL Institute), which was founded by Lewin’s associates. NTL and T-groups are the most significant sources of origin of OD because (a) of the philosophy of the T-group, namely, the trainer works in a non-directive manner, and learning takes place out of what is happening in the group (a paradigm of action research) and (b) the pioneers and significant developers of OD were T-group trainers in the NTL Institute. It was when the T-group was being applied to working teams that the focus and term organization development emerged. In Britain, the Tavistock Institute developed its own form of the T-group in the Tavistock Conference, and its work on socio-technical systems paralleled OD.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading