Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Dissertation Writing

Outlining how action research dissertations may be written is a complex task for several reasons. Firstly, as this encyclopedia demonstrates, because action research is a family of approaches that operate in a wide variety of settings and with great diversity, there is no single version of action research where one set of criteria might be considered definitive. Accordingly, there is no consensus on any one approach. Secondly, regulations and practices for the presentation of dissertations differ from university to university and from programme to programme. Thirdly, whether a dissertation is written by an undergraduate, a master’s or doctoral student or a practitioner, doctorate accreditation sets norms for what a dissertation has to contain and how it is presented. This entry focuses on the broadly shared characteristics of an action research dissertation, which are generally seen as essential because the dissertation is viewed as a formal, academic document, usually contributing significantly to the subsequent granting of a postgraduate degree.

An action research dissertation is an academic document and therefore needs to conform to academic requirements of justification of the topic and approach, demonstration and defence of rigour in methodology and methods of inquiry, familiarity with existing content and process literature and contribution to knowledge. In these ways, an action research dissertation is no different from most other social science dissertations, though its presentation and argument differ from traditional presentations.

Constructing and Writing an Action Research Dissertation

Practices describing action research dissertations typically suggest that it should be structured to deal with

  • the purpose and rationale of the research,
  • the context,
  • the methodology and method of inquiry,
  • the story and outcomes,
  • self-reflection and learning of the action researcher,
  • reflection on the story in the light of the experience and the theory and
  • extrapolation to a broader context and articulation of usable knowledge.

This is not to say that such a structure would necessarily mean that each of these headings has to be a chapter in itself, or considered sequentially, but rather that these issues should be clearly dealt with formally. For example, the story may be spread over several chapters, depending on its length and complexity and the extent of the research project. Each of these broad expectations is explored in turn below.

Purpose and Rationale of the Research

The section on the purpose and rationale of an action research project presents the case, stating why the specific piece of action research is worth doing for whomever, why it is worth studying and what it is that it seeks to contribute to the world of theory and of practice. It is critical at the outset of an action research dissertation to make both a practical and an academic case for the research. This is not just an argument for credibility but a formal effort to locate the work in both a practical and an academic context. This is related in particular to two of the quality criteria generally associated with action research (see the entry ‘Quality’), those of ‘actionability’ (i.e. the extent to which the paper provides new ideas that guide action in response to need) and ‘significance’ (i.e. the extent to which the insights in the manuscript are significant in content and process, where significant refers to the meaning and relevance of the action research beyond its immediate context in support of the flourishing of persons, communities and the wider ecology).

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading