Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Dialogic Inquiry

Dialogic inquiry is an approach to education that employs collaborative action research on classroom interaction to improve learning and teaching.

There is growing evidence that students develop a greater understanding of the topics they study when they have opportunities to engage in dialogue about them with their peers as well as their teachers. For this to become the norm of classroom interaction, however, two conditions need to be in place. First, students must feel confident in voicing their ideas and being listened to respectfully but critically by their peers and, second, their teacher must develop a ‘dialogic stance’, that is to say, an approach to class discussion that values more the attempt to achieve shared understanding than individual students’ ability to reproduce what is considered to be ‘correct’ information on demand. To create such a classroom environment is not easy, for it requires a break with the didactic style of traditional education, which has been further reinforced in recent years by the emphasis at national and district levels on a standardized curriculum and assessment.

The adoption of an inquiry orientation to learning and teaching represents an attempt to overcome the constraints of traditional education, in which the curriculum is delivered to passive students irrespective of their cultural and linguistic backgrounds and with little or no reference to their interests or life experiences. Dialogic inquiry is thus an attempt to use inquiry into a topic of interest to generate productive dialogue. This entry reviews two ways in which inquiry is being used: first, as an organizing principle in the development and enactment of the curriculum and, second, as an approach to teachers’ professional development.

Origins

The importance of dialogue with more competent others for children’s linguistic and intellectual development was one of the more important findings of a large-scale longitudinal study of preschool children’s spontaneous talk carried out by Gordon Wells in the Bristol Study (1969–84). Children who experienced more conversation with their parents and older siblings were more likely to make accelerated progress in learning to talk and more likely to be successful in school, as measured by tests conducted at ages 7 and 10 years. The reasons for their more rapid development can be attributed to two features of their linguistic interactions. First, as Michael Halliday observed, children naturally develop language to perform interactional functions that are important to them and, second, when others take up and help children to extend their ability to talk about topics that interest them, they are receiving assistance in what Lev Vygotsky called the ‘Zone of Proximal Development’.

When a subsample of the children in the Bristol Study were regularly observed in their first 5 years in school, it was found that they rarely experienced the sort of linguistic and intellectual support they had received in their preschool years. They rarely asked questions about matters that interested them, and when they did originate a topic of conversation with a teacher, the teacher frequently diverted the conversation to a matter that she or he considered more important. In sum, in most cases, the education the children received was directed by their teachers, who followed a predetermined curriculum that did not, for the most part, build on their interests and life experiences.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading