Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Action Learning

Action Learning is a rich philosophy of learning and practice that offers a significant contribution to the fields of professional and management education and development, organization change, problem-solving and performance improvement, as well as to action research.

This entry provides an outline of Action Learning’s origins, traditions and key ideas. Contemporary ideas and applications are illustrated before considering the particular relevance of Action Learning to action research.

Origins, Traditions and Key Ideas

Action Learning, as a coherent and named body of practice, was created and developed by the Englishman Reg Revans (1907–2003) in the mid twentieth century, where he evolved his notion of Action Learning through his work in the coalmines and in the health services of Britain and Belgium. Influenced by his early training as a physicist at Cambridge University in the late 1920s— where he encountered Nobel Prize–winning scientists meeting weekly, not to display their achievements but to learn from one another through voicing the challenges and unknowns they were tackling—Revans encouraged coal pit managers, when they had problems, to meet together on-site in small groups and, rather than draw on external experts to solve their problems for them, to ask one another questions about what they saw in order to find their own solutions. Later, in Belgium, he introduced a process whereby senior managers learned through spending time investigating problems in areas unfamiliar to them.

Revans eschewed a definition of Action Learning, saying that to define it was too simplistic. However, he also argued that as Action Learning can be characterized by specific assumptions, objectives and an educational method, it was neither merely common sense nor simply action that may or may not result in learning.

Assumptions, Objectives and Educational Method

Core assumptions that underpin Action Learning are that learning derives from taking action and asking insightful questions about pressing problems or enticing opportunities. Formal instruction and theory are not sufficient. External training, instruction or expertise is not relied upon because the existing codified knowledge, whilst it may be drawn from, may not suit the specific context of a particular problem. Processes such as action and feedback, asking fresh questions, learning from and with peers and creating a multiplier effect between individual and organizational learning are central to Action Learning.

Revans saw the objectives of Action Learning as follows:

  • To make meaningful progress on the treatment of some real opportunities, challenges or problems
  • To enable participants sufficient scope to learn for themselves with others
  • To encourage those engaged in providing management development to assist participants to learn with and from one another

Based on a philosophy of action (praxeology), Action Learning is a challenging educational method that is much more than simply learning by doing, in that it engages participants in risk-taking experimentation and a degree of self-challenge, on the basis that individuals cannot expect to change others or an organization if they cannot change themselves.

Revans’ Classical Principles

Though Revans resisted a simplistic definition of Action Learning, there were consistent principles in the practice he wrote about, which have become widely known as Revans’ Classical Principles (RCPs) (see Figure

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading