Entry
Entries A-Z
Republican Government
Although today the terms are almost interchangeable, republican government was not the same as democracy to the founders of the United States. Made up almost entirely of members of the new nation's elite, they equated democracy with mob rule. What they were creating, they believed and intended, was a representative democracy or republican form of government.
In a democracy, they feared, a faction or party could become a tyrannical majority. But a “well-constructed Union” formed along republican lines, James Madison wrote in The Federalist, would tend to “break and control the violence of faction.”
Besides ensuring a government of wise and patriotic citizens, the founders hoped, their Constitution would separate executive, legislative, and judicial powers sufficiently to prevent any one branch from assuming excessive control. Another of those checks and balances was the federal system, with powers shared between the national government and the states.
The powers of the national government were to be those spelled out or implied in the Constitution. By contrast, the states were to exercise reserved powers—that is, those not specifically prohibited to the states and those not granted to the national government. As an example of prohibited activities, the Constitution bars the states from coining money or entering into treaties or alliances with foreign countries.
Reflecting the split that preceded adoption of the Constitution in 1789, the first American political parties divided largely over the issue of national versus state government authority. The Federalists—a loose coalition of merchants, shippers, financiers, and other business interests—favored the strong central government established by the Constitution. The opposition (at first called anti-federalists or Jeffersonians and later known as democratic-republicans) were farmers and frontiersmen intent on preserving the sovereignty of the states.

“The Constitution, in all its provisions, looks to an indestructible Union, composed of indestructible States. When, therefore, Texas became one of the United States, she entered into an indissoluble relation. All the obligations of perpetual union, and all the guaranties of republican government in the Union, attached at once to the State. The act which consummated her admission into the Union was something more than a compact; it was the incorporation of a new member into the political body. And it was final.”
—U.S. Supreme Court in Texas v. White, 1868
Federal Supremacy
In a system in which powers are divided between the federal government and the states, it is inevitable that conflicts will arise. To deal with them, Article VI contains a federal supremacy clause, which makes the Constitution and the laws and treaties passed under it the “supreme Law of the Land.” This provision means that all state laws, executive orders, and judicial decisions must conform to the Constitution, treaties, and laws of the United States, or they are invalid.
Such conflicts arose almost immediately after the Constitution was put into effect. They aligned the Federalists, who advocated a strong national government capable of encouraging commercial development and exercising discipline over the states, against the Anti-Federalist advocates of states' rights. In one of its most important early decisions, McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), the Supreme Court came down strongly on the side of those who favored a broad interpretation of constitutional grants to the national government.
...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches