Entry
Entries A-Z
Incumbency
For a political candidate, nothing succeeds like success. Once in office, the incumbent has a better-than-average chance of being reelected. For presidents, the reelection rate has been about 66 percent. It is even higher for other elective offices, particularly the U.S. House of Representatives, where about 90 percent of members return every two years if they want another term. The Senate return rate is also high, if somewhat less consistent.
Incumbency gives the candidate an edge in name recognition, fund raising, attracting news coverage, using the powers and perquisites of office, and the freedom to campaign without losing income.
The advantages usually far outweigh the disadvantages, but incumbency can have liabilities. They include the possibility of mistakes or failure, the occasional need to take unpopular actions or stands, the inevitable tie to a record that the incumbent may wish to bury, and the blame for events that were beyond the incumbent's control.
Presidency
The best indication that incumbency gives an advantage to the sitting president is the success rate of those who sought reelection or election in their own right if they had succeeded to the presidency. Of the thirty attempts (including Franklin D. Roosevelt's in 1936, 1940, and 1944) twenty were successful, through and including Bill Clinton's in 1996.
Other recent history, however, has shown that renomination is not inevitable. Harry S. Truman, Lyndon B. Johnson, Gerald R. Ford, Jimmy Carter, and George Bush all faced strong challenges when they sought to run again. Truman in 1952 and Johnson in 1968 ultimately decided against seeking renomination, and they are not included in the thirty presidential reelection efforts. Since 1951, when the Twenty-second Amendment was ratified, the second-term incumbent president has been barred from running again. The amendment exempted Truman in 1952, but he chose not to seek a second full term.
If the incumbent appears at all vulnerable, another candidate likely will emerge to contend for the nomination. The decline of party identification and the rise of candidate-centered campaigns and interest groups can make an incumbent appear vulnerable if economic or foreign policy crises develop.
Nevertheless, incumbency offers advantages. The president can dominate media coverage, divert attention from domestic problems with foreign policy initiatives, and make use of budgetary and regulatory powers. So great is the prestige of the office that most party members are reluctant to reject an incumbent. No president since Chester A. Arthur in 1884 has lost a renomination effort at a national party convention.
When it appeared in 1980 that he might become the first president since Arthur to lose the convention vote, Carter embarked on a campaign strategy that overwhelmed challenges by Massachusetts senator Edward M. Kennedy and California governor Edmund G. “Jerry” Brown Jr. Carter won renomination by using the powers of incumbency. He stayed at the White House occupied with the Iranian hostage crisis, trying to appear above the partisan fray. At the same time he was deeply engaged in the primary strategy—persuading southern states to push their primaries to the early part of the schedule.
Incumbents play to the natural reluctance of voters to exchange a known commodity for a newcomer. Their campaign slogans stress stability rather than change. The Carter-Mondale slogan in 1980 was “A Tested and Trustworthy Team.” Similarly, pointing to a healthy economy and peace abroad, Clinton and Vice President Al Gore campaigned on a “don't rock the boat” theme in 1996.
...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches