Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Privacy Rights of Teachers

It is commonly believed that teachers, especially in public schools, enjoy a measure of privacy in their personal lives. The freedoms that teachers have on the job regarding what and how they may teach, what they may do and say, what organizations they may join, even what they may wear are under scrutiny and face growing challenges. Within the context of privacy rights, teachers may exercise personal choices, ranging from living with a person of the opposite sex to other lifestyle choices. The constitutional rights considered among the most basic for all include freedom of expression, religion, and association and freedom from discrimination.

Recent years have seen a movement toward reem-phasizing teachers' responsibilities as moral exemplars in and out of school. Many parents have demanded that school officials reinforce traditional values among students, and school district policies generally require that teachers serve as positive role models. Based in part on such requirements, the supreme court of Colorado upheld the dismissal of a tenured teacher for immorality, because she violated board policy by drinking beer with students while acting in her official capacity as cheerleader sponsor (Blaine v. Moffat County School District RE No. 1, 1988). This case represents one of many that stand for the proposition that teacher misbehavior outside the school that reduces teachers' capacity to serve as positive role models can justify reprimands or dismissals as long as procedural and substantive due process rights are not violated. Against this backdrop, the interpretation of teachers' constitutional rights-such as freedom of expression, freedom to express religious views inside or outside of the classroom, and freedom of association-continues to evolve.

Speech and Religion

Teachers have the freedom and knowledge to educate America's youth. Yet, this freedom comes with significant responsibilities and some restrictions because of the potential impact on impressionable children. Consequently, what teachers may or should say is often scrutinized. The U.S. Supreme Court, in the landmark case Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205, Will County (1968), explained that teachers maintain some rights of expression as long as they are commenting on matters of public concern. In this case, the Court noted that there should be a balance between the interests of the teacher, as a citizen, in commenting upon matters of public concern, and the interest of the state.

In Pickering, the Supreme Court held that the teacher had the right to express his views on a matter of legitimate public concern and that his criticism of school policy was not adequate grounds for dismissal. At the same time, if a teacher's comments are sarcastic, unprofessional, insulting, or based on private disagreements, many cases support the notion that the teacher may be disciplined or even dismissed. Like all determinations on the limits of speech, the comments of teachers are subject to time, place, and manner restrictions. In litigation related to teacher rights and responsibilities, the courts typically examine the consequences and the context of teachers' actions or words and factor them into an equation balancing the public interests of school boards against the private rights of teachers.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading