Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Marbury v. Madison

In Marbury v. Madison (1803), the fledgling U.S. Supreme Court asserted its authority both to review acts of Congress and to invalidate those acts that conflict with the U.S. Constitution. In a case that depended upon power granted to the Court by Congress over and above what the Constitution provided, the Court emphasized that the Constitution is paramount. At the same time, the Court established itself as the appropriate body to evaluate whether a law either conflicts with or conforms to the Constitution. Marbury v. Madison is thus an important case defining the concept of judicial review that is so important in cases relating to schools and many other aspects of American life.

Facts of the Case

The facts in Marbury reflect the politics of the day. Thomas Jefferson was elected as the third U.S. president, defeating John Adams in the election of 1800, which was ultimately resolved on February 17, 1801. After losing the election, but before leaving office, President Adams determined to fill a number of judicial vacancies created by the Judiciary Act of 1801 with members of his own Federalist Party. The appointments were made on March 2, 1801, just two days before the expiration of his term, and were approved by the Senate on the next day; and Adams signed the commissions. However, in order for the appointments to be effective, the commissions had to be delivered to those who were appointed. This task was delegated to John Marshall, acting secretary of state and soon to be chief justice of the Supreme Court.

Despite his best efforts, Mr. Marshall was unable to deliver a number of the judicial commissions prior to President Adams's leaving office. When President Jefferson took office on March 4, 1801, he directed his new secretary of state, James Madison, not to deliver the remaining commissions for President Adams's “eleventh hour” appointments. Jefferson believed that the commissions, not having been delivered prior to the expiration of President Adams's term, were void.

William Marbury was one of Adams's “midnight appointees” to a newly created justice of the peace position in the District of Columbia. When his commission was not delivered, Marbury sued James Madison. Marbury, taking advantage of a provision in Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, began an original action in the Supreme Court seeking an order to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue. In essence, Marbury was asking the Supreme Court to order the secretary of state to deliver his commission.

Marbury's action raised the issue of whether the Supreme Court had the jurisdiction, or the power, to hear and resolve his case. The U.S. Constitution defines the jurisdiction of the Court in Article III, Section 2, Clause 2:

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be a Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned [within the judicial power of the United States], the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading