Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Loyalty Oaths

Loyalty oaths are administered as a condition to public employment or entrance into the practice of a given occupation, such as teaching. A teacher loyalty oath is a promise to uphold the constitutions and laws of a jurisdiction. Typically, in cases involving education law, loyalty oaths involve state laws that mandate adherence to the federal and state constitutions and laws. For instance, the language of the oath may state,

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America and the Constitution of the State of [insert state name] and that I will oppose the overthrow of the government of the United States of America or of this State by force, violence or by any illegal or unconstitutional method. (Cole v. Richardson, 1972)

In many instances, loyalty oaths were passed into law as a reaction to heightened concerns over threats to national security. The balance between the sensitive nature of individual rights and governmental interests limits the acceptable application and wording of loyalty oaths. Stated another way, constitutional protections set parameters regarding to whom loyalty oaths apply and what considerations exist in the crafting of the loyalty oath language.

The difficulty with loyalty oaths rests in the construction of constitutionally permissible language. In other words, questions emerge over how public employers can adopt loyalty oaths that do not offend the constitutional rights of employees. In attempting to address this question, the courts have created constitutional doctrines to assess the legality of loyalty oaths. Through a series of decisions, the Supreme Court established four parameters: Loyalty oaths (1) may not infringe on established constitutional rights, (2) may not prevent or chill protected speech, (3) may not limit associational memberships and activities or presume subscription to beliefs based on associational affiliations, and (4) may not contain vague language so that a person of “common intelligence” cannot decipher their meaning. These parameters are discussed further in this entry.

Established Rights

First, the courts have made it clear that loyalty oaths may not infringe on established constitutional rights. For instance, shortly after the Civil War, early cases in the application of a loyalty oath for public office challenged the constitutionality of its statutory language. One Missouri statute required public officials to attest to never having participated in activities that were connected to actions against the federal or state governments, which would have included actions in support of the Confederates.

The U.S. Supreme Court declared the law unconstitutional because it made once-legal acts illegal retrospectively (i.e., ex post facto laws) while declaring individuals guilty of crimes based on those acts (i.e., bill of attainder), in violation of Article I, Section 9, of the U.S. Constitution. Similarly, in instances of an otherwise constitutionally permissible loyalty oath, the U.S. Supreme Court held that an individual's refusal to take the oath cannot result in a default interpretation that the individual subscribes to the nonsupport of the federal and state constitutions and believes in the overthrow of the government. According to the Court, a default interpretation of an individual's subscription of disloyalty-without an opportunity to explain coupled with the summary dismissal from public employment-violates the individual's due process rights.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading