Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The empathic teacher and the empathic student are important topics for consideration by educational psychologists. Contemporary approaches to empathy conceive of empathy as a social interaction between any two individuals with one individual experiencing the feelings of a second individual. Although there is some degree of correspondence between the affect of the observer and the affect of the observed, the affects are not identical. The process of empathy is currently acknowledged to be contingent on both cognitive and affective factors, the particular influence varying with the age and other attributes of the individual and with the situational context. The model proposed by Norma Feshbach emphasizes the cognitive ability to discriminate affective states in others, the more mature cognitive ability to assume the perspective and role of another person, and the affective ability to experience emotions in an appropriate manner. Martin Hoffman's developmental model also has three components—cognitive, affective, and motivational—and focuses on empathic responsiveness to distress in others as the motivation for altruistic behavior.

Definitional concerns, methodological problems, and theoretical controversies have characterized this area of study. Nevertheless, the status of empathy as an important variable meriting consideration and empirical study has dramatically changed during the past 30 years. Its relevance to a number of disciplines, including neuroscience, psychology, sociology, political science, education, medicine, and the arts, has no doubt contributed to the burgeoning interest and activity in the study of empathy.

Measurement

The task of assessing empathy remains a formidable problem. The multidimensionality of the construct and the internal properties of its components leave a wide hiatus between (a) the critical role afforded to empathy in the individual's development and social behavior and (b) its data base. Assessment procedures for children's empathy vary as a function of stimulus modality (e.g., stories, audiotapes, cartoons, paper-and-pencil questions, slides, and narration), as well as response modality (e.g., reflexive crying and self-reports). More recently, measures of physiological arousal, such as heart rate and electrodermal responses, are being used to assess empathy.

Adult measures tend to be paper-and-pencil, questionnaire-type instruments. However, recent measurement developments entail the analysis of facial musculature responses to others and neuronal responses, the latter pertaining to so-called mirror neurons that match the neural reactions of another person.

Origins

The answer to the ontogenetic pattern of empathic development is unresolved. Infant responsiveness to the crying of other infants has been noted in infants as young as 2 weeks. Studies also show that infants younger than 1 year of age can respond differentially to faces depicting different affective states. In the studies by Carolyn Zahn-Waxler and Marian Radke-Yarrow, very young children exhibited ‘empathy-like behaviors.’ And while there is a close theoretical and empirical relationship between empathy and prosocial behaviors, empathy is theoretically distinct from and should not be considered as synonymous with helping, caring, sharing, or any other positive social behavior. Generally, it can be said that a cluster of empathy-related skills appear very early in an individual and become more differentiated and purposeful with age. Individuals, at any age, vary in empathic responsiveness, the source of which may be biologically/temperamentally or situationally/environmentally determined.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading