Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Unions, of Teachers

Unions, of Teachers

The lineage of teacher unions can be traced directly to industrialization and to the industrial-model school organizations that resulted. Just as trade union structures mirrored their industry counterparts, teacher unions often established structures that mirrored those of school districts.

Before the industrial age, workers organized themselves largely around their work. Guilds were created to control entrance into a work group and restrict the availability of certain types of work. Trade unions regulated apprentice practices and established hiring halls. Craft unions contributed money that was used to pay members who were sick or unemployed and regulated standards in their craft by creating sanctions when members violated rules that were created by the association. However, as the hierarchical structures of factories became the norm, the organizational structures of unions changed to match the workplace. Industrial unionism took hold during the turn of the century, waned during hard economic times, and was revived again during the industrial prosperity of the late 1940s. Although, like many workers, teachers had been organizing for a long time, they did not formally associate with unions in the beginning of their organizational efforts. The formal association of teachers with unions began with the formation of the National Education Association (NEA).

Development of the National Education Association

Just as industrial workers were organizing, so were educational workers. Although not considered a union at the time, the NEA was founded in 1857. During its first 30 years, the NEA functioned more like a debating society and then later merged with the National Association of School Superintendents. By the turn of the century, college presidents controlled the organization and classroom teachers had little to do with its activities for several decades. By the1890s, 50% of active members were administrators and 11% were teachers.

Industrial practices and the growing labor movement influenced the development of teachers' unions as well as policies aimed at preventing them. Although NEA was not formally affiliated with organized labor, in 1915 the Chicago Board of Education adopted a “yellow-dog” contract, which stipulated that teachers who belonged to unions would not be rehired. In spite of these scare tactics, some teachers were dissatisfied with how the NEA dealt with teachers, and started to work to create a new national organization of teachers. These teachers wanted an organization focused on the needs of teachers, and they were interested in affiliating with organized labor. The result was the creation of a second national teacher organization—the American Federation of Teachers (AFT).

Development of the American Federation of Teachers

The AFT was founded in 1916 partly at the urging of Samuel Gompers, the president of the American Federation of Labor. Although the NEA had been in existence for quite some time, the formulation of a teachers' organization that was associated with organized labor signified a shift in attitude. The new national organization, the AFT, created locals affiliated with the labor movement and was not dominated by administrators. The NEA traditionally felt that unionism lowered the ideals of teaching and that unionization led to teachers losing their image of being public servants. Defining and promoting teacher professionalism is a recurring theme in the development of teacher unionism and in the union's role in education reform.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading