Entry
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Rural Education
Rural education has been defined by a number of different criteria over the last half century. The National Rural and Small Schools Consortium considers a district rural if inhabitants number fewer than 150 per square mile or if the district is located in a county where 60% or more of the population lives in communities of 5,000 or fewer. Other organizations and government entities have applied either a 25,000 resident criteria to classify communities as rural, or some have applied a more restrictive 2,500 resident restriction. Five terms were used by the U.S. Department of Education's Center for Education Statistics in 1987 to define or imply rurality: rural, nonmetropolitan, small town, small place, and school size. Rural and nonmetropolitan were identified as subsets for metropolitan status, as were suburban and urban.
The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) reported that approximately 90,000 public schools operate within the United States, of which 38,000 were located in rural areas or small towns in 1999–2000. Schools in rural areas or small towns account for about 42% of all schools in the nation, and 30% of all students. Characteristics unique to rural areas include geographic isolation, small populations, and declining enrollments.
According to an open-ended survey of 50 small rural school superintendents, the most critical issues facing their districts were funding inequities, meeting the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) requirements, attracting and retaining highly qualified teachers, declining enrollments, along with implementation of technology and distance learning. Most crucial were funding issues, meeting the Adequate Yearly Progress standard of NCLB and recruitment/retention of highly qualified teachers. In the other pressing issues category were problems associated with declining enrollments and the need to provide vital learning resources to students effectively through distance learning
Funding
Three decades of litigation and a considerable number of studies document the inequities in educational funding for property-poor rural schools. Persistent dependence on local property tax revenues has perpetuated funding disparities among urban, suburban, and rural districts. School districts with high-priced residential or commercial property have substantially greater resources available to support education. In the midst of this wealth of knowledge, state legislatures continue to rely on the property tax as a primary tax base source for public schools, which ultimately results in disproportionate funding for poorer rural schools and specifically rural students.
The overwhelming majority of states have been unwilling thus far to abandon the property tax, though more progressive states such as Michigan and Wisconsin have met the challenge and overcome political fears to fund education with a more progressive approach. As a result of continued taxpayer discontent with local property taxes, the Michigan legislature abolished local school property taxes in 1993. A referendum was initiated to construct a system that would replace the abolished system of school revenue generation. Michigan's new finance approach approved in 1994 obtains revenue for funding education from a variety of other sources. First, the state sales tax was increased from 4% to 6%, and a statewide property tax was enacted. Next, additional real estate transfer fees were imposed and sin taxes were instituted or increased. Finally, a new system of assessing property and a state foundation grant formula for distributing funds were formulated and enacted.
...
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches