Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet
Authority

Authority is often considered to be the ability to demand obedience or influence the actions, opinions, and beliefs of others. Modern definitions of power, authority, and influence are commonly used interchangeably. Power is not reserved for only the leadership, but can be exercised by individuals at all levels within and outside an organization. Teachers, students, and parents, for example, may be able to influence the behavior and policy formulation of administrators and boards of education. Authority, however, is power vested to individuals as a consequence of their official position or rank within an organization, such as the authority a sergeant may be able to exercise over a private in the military. Organizations typically include many people who are able to exercise power because of their knowledge or access to information; however, authentic authority is reserved only for persons holding formal positions. Although there are a variety of different components that define authority, the most popular definitions examined by students in educational administration fall within the framework of “authentic authority,” as proposed by the German sociologist Max Weber during the early 1900s.

Weber regarded authority as comprising three types of legitimate power that is accepted circumstantially by followers: legal-rational, traditional, and charismatic.

Legal-Rational Authority

According to Weber, legal-rational authority is legitimized by complex, usually written, rules laid out in the form of constitutions, statutes, and other sources of societal law. This form of authority is found not only in governmental settings but is also prevalent in defining the organization and control of most large corporations as well. Authority is vested to superiors by specific legal parameters that serve to structure the positions or offices they hold.

Traditional Authority

The foundation for traditional authority lies in the preservation of the social order as it has existed throughout history. Obligations of followers are based on personal loyalty to the ruler whose governance is legitimized by traditional rules and regulations. Obedience is unswerving among the faithful and adheres to the doctrine of “The Divine Right of Kings.” Some examples of traditional authority include ruling families, the feudal systems in early Europe and Asia, some family businesses, and various tribal organizations. It is interesting to note that the ruler is also bound by the same traditional regulations as the subjects and any deviation from this norm would erode the legitimacy of his authority.

Charismatic Authority

Charismatic authority results in the devotion of followers to an individual based upon his or her character, heroism, or gifts of grace. These leaders are obeyed because of certain divine gifts or unusual qualities they possess, such as revelations from God, extraordinary intelligence, and powerful speech. Examples of the charismatic leader include war heroes, prophets, and visionaries. Allegiance to the charismatic leader lasts only as long as the followers ascribe special qualities to him or her.

Weber's conception of authority focused on the relationships between the leader and follower and not attributes of the leader alone. He understood also that types of legitimate authority may overlap and be evident in the styles of certain leaders.

See also
  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading