Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Thomas Woodrow Wilson served as the 28th president of the United States from 1913 until 1921. During his administration, the United States began implementing a universal drug management policy. The Harrison Narcotics Tax Act (Harrison Act), signed into law by Wilson in 1913, brought important changes to the way potentially harmful drugs were produced and dispersed. This act, and resulting court decisions, laid the groundwork for nearly all future drug restrictions.

In the run up to and the beginning of Wilson's policy-shaping term, public opinion in the United States was highly critical of those who abused cocaine or opium. Sensationalist newspapers played on latent racial tensions, claiming opium incited young black men to rape white women. Opium was also reported to promote idleness in working men.

Christian missionaries returned from overseas with stories of entire populations enslaved to opium. Concomitantly, the temperance movement was gaining momentum in its crusade to eradicate what it saw as the alcohol terror, and managed to inject its viewpoints into the public consciousness. Prevailing thought cast addiction to be a moral failing, as opposed to a treatable disease. Like murder, thievery, or other “moral failings,” addiction to substances would be expunged from the population by force of law and order. Although the Harrison Act was originally established to fulfill treaty obligations from the International Opium Convention, it also satisfied public opinion and expectations that moral offenders be severely punished.

Harrison Act

At initial conception, the Harrison Act was designed as a revenue-building measure. Placed under the jurisdiction of the Treasury Department, the Harrison Act was enforced by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) until the Narcotics Unit of the Bureau of Prohibition eventually took over. According to the act, any agents who manufactured, imported, distributed, or sold opium, cocaine, or heroin products were required to register with the IRS. Medical professionals could register to allocate the named controlled substances, but their prescriptions would be subject to taxation and documentation. Any physician who appeared to prescribe more than the standard amount of opium could risk drawing official attention. Early prosecutions of suspect physicians led to noteworthy Supreme Court rulings that served as precedents for the interpretation of the Harrison Act and later drug policy.

Interpreting Drug Policy

In United States v. Jin Fuey Moy, the Supreme Court approved physician Jin Fuey Moy's prescriptions on the basis that they fell within the normal domain of his practice. This 1916 ruling protected the right for physicians to treat their patients with potentially addictive substances in a controlled and careful manner. Addicts could even be prescribed small amounts of opium to stave off withdrawal symptoms during a gradual detoxification program.

Later Supreme Court cases, United States v. Doremus and Webb v. United States, initially appeared to contradict the earlier United States v. Jin Fuey Moy ruling in which the Supreme Court upheld the Harrison Act. However, close inspection of these cases revealed that the defendants (physicians) were prescribing many times the standard amount of opium approved for medical use. These cases strengthened legislation indicating that physicians and pharmacists would not be permitted to misuse the access to controlled substances that was entrusted to them.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading