Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Rockefeller Laws
The Rockefeller Drug Laws were laws passed in 1973 that criminalized and attempted to reduce the sale, distribution, and possession of narcotic drugs in the state of New York. The bill was named after and enacted by the governor of New York at the time, Nelson Rockefeller, who was a strong supporter of the bill and a staunch advocate for Richard Nixon's “War on Drugs.”
Prior to the Rockefeller Drug Laws, individuals convicted of minor drug offenses were typically sentenced to a drug treatment facility, while more harsh sentences were reserved for those convicted of more serious drug cases, like those involving violent crime. With the passage of the Rockefeller Drug Laws, all individuals convicted of distributing two ounces of narcotics and/or being in the possession of four ounces of narcotics (i.e., cannabis, cocaine, heroin, morphine, or opium), regardless of their past criminal histories, were required to serve a minimum of 15 years to life in prison or a maximum of 25 years to life in prison. The main goals of criminalizing drug offenses were to deter habitual drug users and to prevent more serious drug offenders from committing future crimes. These laws were considered to be the strongest enforcer of Nixon's War on Drugs and the most vigorous attempt to control the possession and distribution of narcotics in the country.
Reaction and Consequences
The Rockefeller Drug Laws received both strong support and opposition. One of the most significant signs of support was Michigan's passage of similar legislation in 1978 when the 650-Lifer Law was enacted. This law stipulated that all individuals convicted of selling, possessing, or distributing 650 ounces or more of cocaine and/or Schedule I or Schedule II opiates be sentenced to life in prison without parole. Despite this support from the Michigan state legislature, the Rockefeller Drug Laws also received considerable opposition from conservatives, liberals, and law enforcement officials. Opponents of the bill, most notably civil rights activists, argued that the bill promoted racial inequality by targeting and burdening low-income African American and Latino communities.
A second source of contention was that the bill established sentencing requirements for individuals convicted of minor drug offenses (i.e., drug possession) that were markedly similar to the sentencing requirements for individuals convicted of murder. In addition, critics argued that the laws criminalized what was fundamentally a public health problem and limited judges' abilities to use discretion in sentencing. Criticism grew as reports of the societal consequences of the bill emerged. For example, to address the significant increase in the prison population that resulted from the laws, more of the New York state budget was devoted to the maintenance of pre-existing prisons and the development of new facilities. As a result, funding for drug treatment programs and facilities was reduced and, in some cases, eliminated; ultimately, this led to the closure of many of these community programs.
Research and Repeal
As a result of the criticisms of the Rockefeller Drug Laws, a number of organizations began to research the effects of these laws. In 1975, a three-year study was initiated by the Joint Committee on New York Drug Law Evaluation, an organization created by the Association of the Bar of the City of New York and Drug Abuse Council, Inc. The study was meant to review the long-term consequences of the Rockefeller Drug Laws. In general, the 168-page report concluded that the tougher sentencing laws had provided little benefit to the state of New York. Specifically, the report concluded that the laws had failed to reduce the recidivism rate, did not reduce the likelihood that drug traffickers would commit violent crimes, and the laws had slowed the state's justice system. Furthermore, investigations into the effects of the Rockefeller Drug Laws demonstrated that they resulted in racial and socioeconomic disparities in the New York prison system, with low-income African Americans and Latinos more likely to be incarcerated for drug offenses than nonminorities. Over time, a variety of studies of this sort demonstrated the ineffectiveness of the Rockefeller Drug Laws.
...
- Employment Division v. Smith (1990)
- Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente União do Vegetal (2006)
- Gonzales v. Oregon
- Gonzales v. Raich (2005)
- Gore v. United States (1958)
- Indianapolis v. Edmond (2000)
- Jin Fuey Moy v. United States (1920)
- Leary v. United States (1967)
- Lewis v. United States (1966)
- Linder v. United States (1925)
- People v. Woody (1964)
- United States v. Doremus (1919)
- United States v. Jeffers (1951)
- United States v. Kuch (1968)
- United States v. Sanchez (1950)
- United States v. Warner (1984)
- Convention on Psychotropic Substances, 1971
- Narcotics Limitation Convention of 1931
- National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse (1972)
- 1909 Shanghai Conference
- 1912 Hague Conference
- 1925 Geneva Convention on Opium and Other Drugs
- 1946 Revision of the Harrison Act
- Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961
- United Nations Convention Against the Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs
- Afghanistan
- Algeria
- Argentina
- Australia
- Azerbaijan
- Bahamas
- Bangladesh
- Belarus
- Belize
- Benin
- Bolivia
- Brazil
- Cambodia
- Canada
- Chile
- China
- Colombia
- Congo
- Costa Rica
- Cuba
- Denmark
- Dominican Republic
- Ecuador
- Egypt
- El Salvador
- France
- Germany
- Ghana
- Greece
- Guatemala
- Haiti
- Honduras
- Hong Kong
- India
- Indonesia
- Iran
- Iraq
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Jamaica
- Japan
- Jordan
- Kazakhstan
- Kenya
- Korea, South
- Kyrgyzstan
- Lao PDR
- Lebanon
- Libya
- Malaysia
- Mexico
- Morocco
- Myanmar
- Netherlands
- New Zealand
- Nicaragua
- Nigeria
- Pakistan
- Panama
- Papua New Guinea
- Paraguay
- Peru
- Philippines
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Russia
- Saudi Arabia
- Senegal
- Singapore
- South Africa
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Tajikistan
- Thailand
- Tunisia
- Turkey
- Uganda
- Ukraine
- United Kingdom
- United States
- Uruguay
- Uzbekistan
- Venezuela
- Vietnam
- Yemen
- Anti-Drug Operations, Pre-1960s
- Anti-Drug Operations, 1960s
- Anti-Drug Operations, 1970s
- Anti-Drug Operations, 1980s
- Anti-Drug Operations, 1990s
- Anti-Drug Operations, 2000s
- Asset Forfeiture
- Cocaine Cartels
- Data Collection Systems
- Drug Trafficking and Political Movements
- Drugs and Money Laundering
- Drugs and Terrorism
- Drugs-Crime Connection
- Golden Crescent
- Golden Triangle
- Prices and Volumes in Illicit Markets, Theories of
- Set and Setting
- Alabama Laws and Programs
- Alaska Laws and Programs
- Alcohol and Drug Abuse Education Amendments (1978)
- Analogue (Designer Drug) Act
- Anti-Drug Abuse Act (Drug-Free America Act)
- Anti-Drug Abuse Amendment Act
- Anti-Drug War Movement
- Arizona Laws and Programs
- Arkansas Laws and Programs
- Aviation Drug-Trafficking Control Act
- Boggs Act
- California Laws and Programs
- Colorado Laws and Programs
- Community Mental Health Centers Act
- Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984
- Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act
- Comprehensive Methamphetamine Control Act
- Connecticut Laws and Programs
- Controlled Substance Registrant Protection Act
- Controlled Substances Import and Export Act
- Controlled Substances Penalties Amendments Act
- Criminal Justice/Enforcement Strategies of Drug Control
- Dangerous Drug Diversion Control Act
- Delaware Laws and Programs
- Demand-Side Policies
- Diversion Programs
- Drug Abuse Control Amendments (1965)
- Drug Courts
- Drug Policies: General Strategies
- Drug Policy Effects on Rates of Crime
- Drug Policy Effects on Rates of Drug-Related Illnesses
- Drug Policy Effects on Rates of Drug-Related Injuries
- Drug Policy Effects on Rates of Incarceration
- Drug Policy Effects on Rates of Use
- Drug-Free Communities Act
- Drugs and the Death Sentence
- Durham-Humphrey Act
- Ecstasy Anti-Proliferation Act
- Eighteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
- Elite Model of Drug Laws
- Elite-Engineered Moral Panics
- Florida Laws and Programs
- Food and Drug Administration
- Georgia Laws and Programs
- Grassroots Model of Drug Laws
- Grassroots Moral Panics
- Group Model of Drug Laws
- Harrison Act
- Hawaii Laws and Programs
- Heroin Trafficking Act
- Idaho Laws and Programs
- Illicit Drug Anti-Proliferation Act
- Illinois Laws and Programs
- Indiana Laws and Programs
- International Drug Policies: Eradication of Narcotic Crops
- International Drug Policies: Interdiction and Law Enforcement
- International Drug Policies: International Cooperation
- International Drug Policies: Sanctions/Economic Assistance
- Iowa Laws and Programs
- “Just Say No”
- Kansas Laws and Programs
- Kentucky Laws and Programs
- Louisiana Laws and Programs
- Maine Laws and Programs
- Mandatory Sentencing
- Marihuana Tax Act (1937)
- Maryland Laws and Programs
- Massachusetts Laws and Programs
- Methadone Control Act
- Michigan Laws and Programs
- Minnesota Laws and Programs
- Mississippi Laws and Programs
- Missouri Laws and Programs
- Montana Laws and Programs
- Moral Panics and Drug Laws
- Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act
- Narcotic Control Act
- Narcotic Drug Act
- Narcotic Drug Import and Export Act
- Narcotics Manufacturers Act
- National Narcotics Act
- Native Races Act
- Nebraska Laws and Programs
- Nevada Laws and Programs
- New Hampshire Laws and Programs
- New Jersey Laws and Programs
- New Mexico Laws and Programs
- New York Laws and Programs
- 1946 Revision of Harrison Act
- North Carolina Laws and Programs
- North Dakota Laws and Programs
- Office of National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act
- Ohio Laws and Programs
- Oklahoma Laws and Programs
- Omnibus Drug Abuse Act
- Opium Poppy Control Act
- Oregon Laws and Programs
- Pennsylvania Laws and Programs
- Policies Regulating Alcohol, U.S.
- Policies Regulating Pharmaceutical Drugs, U.S.
- Policies Regulating Tobacco, U.S.
- Policing Techniques in the War on Drugs
- Porter Narcotic Farm Act
- Pure Food and Drug Act
- Reducing Americans' Vulnerability to Ecstasy Act (RAVE Act)
- Religious Freedom and Drug Laws
- Rhode Island Laws and Programs
- Rockefeller Laws
- Schedule of Controlled Substances
- South Carolina Laws and Programs
- South Dakota Laws and Programs
- Supply-Side Policies
- Tennessee Laws and Programs
- Testing and Sanctions
- Texas Laws and Programs
- Twenty-First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
- Uniform State Narcotics Act
- Utah Laws and Programs
- Vermont Laws and Programs
- Virginia Laws and Programs
- Volstead Act
- “War on Drugs”
- Washington Laws and Programs
- Webb-Kenyon Act
- West Virginia Laws and Programs
- Wisconsin Laws and Programs
- Workplace: Drug-Free Policy
- Workplace: Role, Prevention, and Programs
- Wyoming Laws and Programs
- Zero Tolerance
- Alcoholics Anonymous
- Anti-Drug Grassroots Organizations
- Anti-Tobacco Campaigns
- Armed Forces
- Bureau of Drug Abuse Control
- Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs
- D.A.R.E.
- Drug Enforcement Administration
- Drug Treatment Programs
- Federal Bureau of Narcotics
- International Drug Agencies
- International Narcotics Control Board
- Narcotics Anonymous
- National Organization for Reform of Marijuana Laws
- Office of Drug Abuse Law Enforcement
- Office of National Drug Control Policy
- Office of National Narcotics Intelligence
- Partnership for a Drug-Free America
- President's Advisory Commission on Narcotics and Drug Abuse (Prettyman)
- Secular Organizations for Sobriety
- Social Movements Against Drunken Driving
- Temperance Movement
- United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
- U.S. Department of State Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs
- Women for Sobriety
- Ambrose, Myles
- Anslinger, Harry
- Bartels, John
- Bennett, William
- Bensinger, Peter
- Bonner, Robert
- Bourne, Peter
- Brown, Lee
- Constantine, Thomas
- Dupont, Robert
- Giordano, Henry
- Greene, Stephen
- Hutchinson, Asa
- Ingersoll, John
- Kerlikowske, Gil
- Lawn, John
- Leonhart, Michele
- Lindesmith, Alfred
- Marshall, Donnie
- Martinez, Bob
- McCaffrey, Barry R.
- Mill, John Stuart
- Mullen, Francis
- Sullivan, William
- Tandy, Karen
- Turner, Carlton
- Walters, John
- Bush Administration, George H. W.
- Bush Administration, George W.
- Carter Administration, James
- Clinton Administration, William
- Coolidge Administration, Calvin
- Eisenhower Administration, Dwight
- Ford Administration, Gerald
- Harding Administration, Warren
- Hoover Administration, Herbert
- Johnson Administration, Lyndon
- Kennedy Administration, John F.
- Nixon Administration, Richard
- Obama Administration, Barack
- Presidential Administrations Prior to Federal Drug Regulation
- Reagan Administration, Ronald
- Roosevelt Administration, Franklin D.
- Roosevelt Administration, Theodore
- Taft Administration, William Howard
- Truman Administration, Harry
- Wilson Administration, Woodrow
- Addiction Maintenance
- Coerced Drug Treatment
- Disease Model of Use
- Drug Abuse Warning Network
- Drug Testing
- Drug Treatment Programs
- Evaluative Evidence of Prevention Programs
- Evaluative Evidence of Rehab/Treatment Programs
- Group Therapy
- Harm Reduction
- Inpatient Treatment Programs
- Laboratory Techniques
- Needle Exchange Programs
- Prescription Drug Abuse
- Prevention Programs
- Rational Addiction Model of Drug Use
- Rehabilitation/Treatment Programs
- Safe Injection Rooms
- Single Distribution Theory of Consumption
- SMART Recovery
- 12-Step Recovery Programs
- Alcohol
- Amphetamines
- Antagonist Medications
- Barbiturates
- Caffeine
- Club Drugs
- Cocaine
- Crack
- Ecstasy
- Freebase
- Hallucinogens
- Heroin
- Inhalants
- Ketamine
- Khat
- LSD
- Marijuana
- Methadone
- Methamphetamine
- Morphine
- Over-the-Counter Drugs
- Salvia Divinorum
- Sedatives
- Steroids
- Synthetic Narcotics
- Tobacco
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches