Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Needle Exchange Programs

Sharing injecting equipment is a major risk factor for contracting blood-borne viruses, notably human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C. Needle exchange programs (NEP), also called needle syringe programs, provide clean injecting equipment as well as the opportunity for safer use interventions. The goal of NEP is to reduce the spread of infectious diseases (HIV, hepatitis), with secondary goals to: increase access to harm reduction support services and treatment services; provide information and advice about safer injecting drug use (and safer sexual practices); and make contact with hidden populations. NEP services also decrease the circulation time of syringes, thereby reducing the potential for re-use and hence infection.

NEP programs come in a number of forms: those associated with drug treatment services, those in outreach settings, fixed site vending machines, mobile services (e.g., foot patrol, van), distribution via retail pharmacies, and provision of equipment in supervised injecting centers. There is a large diversity of NEP programs. Services provided within NEP differ between programs, with some focused solely on the provision of clean injecting equipment (syringes, needles, water, swabs, bleach kits, disposal container, and filters). Other programs include education and information; referral to drug treatment services; referral to HIV counseling and testing services; medical care; social and welfare services; and general support.

A variety of studies have found that needle exchange programs can be very cost-effective in reducing the spread of disease.

None

NEP programs also vary in the extent to which they are free or charge the injecting drug user for the equipment (or some components—for example, in Australia all equipment is freely provided but users pay for sterile water). Programs also vary in the extent to which they collect used equipment, and whether they operate as a strict exchange (one for one) or make equipment freely available and in unlimited quantities irrespective of the return of used syringes. Australian programs do not require “exchange” of dirty needles to receive clean ones. Secondary NEPs are now being explored, especially in the United States where there is limited access to primary NEP. Secondary NEPs operate via one peer attending the primary NEP for equipment, then distributing it among his or her own networks.

Criticisms and Concerns

NEPs have been controversial partly because of the nonjudgmental nature of their interactions with injection drug users (IDUs). This is consistent with the overall “harm reduction” approach, anathema to some fervent believers in the “War on Drugs.” Opponents of NEPs offer three criticisms: that it is immoral, especially using public funds, to provide equipment for an act—heroin injection—that is not only illegal in itself but is often financed from the proceeds of predatory crime; that the availability of equipment via NEPs and their implicit endorsement of continued illicit drug use will tend to increase the initiation rate and decrease the quit rate to injection drug use; and that the programs are ineffective in reducing disease-transmission risk.

In most of the world, concern about the AIDS epidemic overwhelmed these objections, but in the United States, where the “drug war” impulse is especially strong, as is the link between heroin use and crime, NEPs became fiercely controversial. Some African American community leaders strongly resisted NEPs, along with methadone maintenance, as a tool to continue to hold black people in thrall to drug addiction.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading