Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Ingersoll, John
John Ingersoll (1930–) was the director of the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs (BNDD), a position he held for the entire duration of that agency's existence from 1968 until 1973, when it was folded into the newly created Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). A career policeman, Ingersoll had begun as a patrolman (and later sergeant) in Oakland, California, in 1956, and became the International Association of Chiefs of Police's director of field services in 1961. After five years, he moved to Charlotte, North Carolina, to take a job as their new chief of police until called upon to direct the newly created BNDD.
The BNDD was placed in the Justice Department and formed by merging the Treasury Department's Bureau of Narcotics and the Food and Drug Administration's Bureau of Drug Abuse Control, and is somewhat emblematic of the transition from drug policy that was centered on revenue and consumer protection to drug policy with a police force. The DEA would be a move further in that direction, incorporating intelligence gathering, foreign policy, and financial intelligence. Ingersoll's appointment not only fit the law enforcement character of the new agency, it was a reaction to the widespread corruption that had been discovered in the Bureau of Narcotics. In Charlotte, Ingersoll had developed a reputation for being incorruptible and forthright, which was exactly what the federal government needed after a flurry of Bureau of Narcotics agents resigned amid investigations of their entanglements with drug dealers.
Ingersoll inherited a workforce that continued to have problems with corruption. Some of the corruption could be attributed to simple weakness in the face of temptation; more than many criminals, drug lords had plentiful cash on hand for bribes, a problem that had been faced during Prohibition and in Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) dealings with the Mafia. But some of it, Ingersoll felt, came from an emphasis on filling arrest quotas. The easiest way, and for high enough quotas the only way, to reliably fill those quotas was to use informants. While the FBI cultivated long-term relationships with informants, their motive in doing so was principally information gathering, rather than building up arrest numbers in the short term. Many of the Narcotics agents caught in the scandals that ended that Bureau had worked with informants to mutual benefit: the informant turned in other drug dealers whose arrests met the agent's quota, and the dealers who were thus arrested were naturally the informant's competitors, which benefited his own business.
Ingersoll's chief inspector, Patrick Fuller, had been a friend since their days in Oakland, but his experience was as an Internal Revenue Service investigator, and managing complicated matters of internal security in a new agency in which old cliques survived from its constituent agencies was beyond his capabilities. Ingersoll's worries did not ease over time, and he soon requested that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) engage in a covert operation to root out any corruption in the BNDD. Attorney General John Mitchell supported the suggestion, and the operation was quickly approved.
Undercover CIA officers were “hired” as new BNDD agents, and spied on the agency from within. Fuller himself did not know the identities of all the spies involved, and no records were kept, according to a subsequent Congressional report on CIA activities. There are indications that the CIA's real motive in so quickly agreeing to Ingersoll's request was to use its agents to access BNDD's intelligence on foreign drug traffickers; certainly the suspicion that the CIA was gathering intelligence on other entities within the federal government was one of the catalysts for the aforementioned Congressional investigation. Though the data suggests that corruption persisted in the BNDD, the CIA's operation never resulted in any dismissals.
...
- Employment Division v. Smith (1990)
- Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente União do Vegetal (2006)
- Gonzales v. Oregon
- Gonzales v. Raich (2005)
- Gore v. United States (1958)
- Indianapolis v. Edmond (2000)
- Jin Fuey Moy v. United States (1920)
- Leary v. United States (1967)
- Lewis v. United States (1966)
- Linder v. United States (1925)
- People v. Woody (1964)
- United States v. Doremus (1919)
- United States v. Jeffers (1951)
- United States v. Kuch (1968)
- United States v. Sanchez (1950)
- United States v. Warner (1984)
- Convention on Psychotropic Substances, 1971
- Narcotics Limitation Convention of 1931
- National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse (1972)
- 1909 Shanghai Conference
- 1912 Hague Conference
- 1925 Geneva Convention on Opium and Other Drugs
- 1946 Revision of the Harrison Act
- Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961
- United Nations Convention Against the Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs
- Afghanistan
- Algeria
- Argentina
- Australia
- Azerbaijan
- Bahamas
- Bangladesh
- Belarus
- Belize
- Benin
- Bolivia
- Brazil
- Cambodia
- Canada
- Chile
- China
- Colombia
- Congo
- Costa Rica
- Cuba
- Denmark
- Dominican Republic
- Ecuador
- Egypt
- El Salvador
- France
- Germany
- Ghana
- Greece
- Guatemala
- Haiti
- Honduras
- Hong Kong
- India
- Indonesia
- Iran
- Iraq
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Jamaica
- Japan
- Jordan
- Kazakhstan
- Kenya
- Korea, South
- Kyrgyzstan
- Lao PDR
- Lebanon
- Libya
- Malaysia
- Mexico
- Morocco
- Myanmar
- Netherlands
- New Zealand
- Nicaragua
- Nigeria
- Pakistan
- Panama
- Papua New Guinea
- Paraguay
- Peru
- Philippines
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Russia
- Saudi Arabia
- Senegal
- Singapore
- South Africa
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Tajikistan
- Thailand
- Tunisia
- Turkey
- Uganda
- Ukraine
- United Kingdom
- United States
- Uruguay
- Uzbekistan
- Venezuela
- Vietnam
- Yemen
- Anti-Drug Operations, Pre-1960s
- Anti-Drug Operations, 1960s
- Anti-Drug Operations, 1970s
- Anti-Drug Operations, 1980s
- Anti-Drug Operations, 1990s
- Anti-Drug Operations, 2000s
- Asset Forfeiture
- Cocaine Cartels
- Data Collection Systems
- Drug Trafficking and Political Movements
- Drugs and Money Laundering
- Drugs and Terrorism
- Drugs-Crime Connection
- Golden Crescent
- Golden Triangle
- Prices and Volumes in Illicit Markets, Theories of
- Set and Setting
- Alabama Laws and Programs
- Alaska Laws and Programs
- Alcohol and Drug Abuse Education Amendments (1978)
- Analogue (Designer Drug) Act
- Anti-Drug Abuse Act (Drug-Free America Act)
- Anti-Drug Abuse Amendment Act
- Anti-Drug War Movement
- Arizona Laws and Programs
- Arkansas Laws and Programs
- Aviation Drug-Trafficking Control Act
- Boggs Act
- California Laws and Programs
- Colorado Laws and Programs
- Community Mental Health Centers Act
- Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984
- Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act
- Comprehensive Methamphetamine Control Act
- Connecticut Laws and Programs
- Controlled Substance Registrant Protection Act
- Controlled Substances Import and Export Act
- Controlled Substances Penalties Amendments Act
- Criminal Justice/Enforcement Strategies of Drug Control
- Dangerous Drug Diversion Control Act
- Delaware Laws and Programs
- Demand-Side Policies
- Diversion Programs
- Drug Abuse Control Amendments (1965)
- Drug Courts
- Drug Policies: General Strategies
- Drug Policy Effects on Rates of Crime
- Drug Policy Effects on Rates of Drug-Related Illnesses
- Drug Policy Effects on Rates of Drug-Related Injuries
- Drug Policy Effects on Rates of Incarceration
- Drug Policy Effects on Rates of Use
- Drug-Free Communities Act
- Drugs and the Death Sentence
- Durham-Humphrey Act
- Ecstasy Anti-Proliferation Act
- Eighteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
- Elite Model of Drug Laws
- Elite-Engineered Moral Panics
- Florida Laws and Programs
- Food and Drug Administration
- Georgia Laws and Programs
- Grassroots Model of Drug Laws
- Grassroots Moral Panics
- Group Model of Drug Laws
- Harrison Act
- Hawaii Laws and Programs
- Heroin Trafficking Act
- Idaho Laws and Programs
- Illicit Drug Anti-Proliferation Act
- Illinois Laws and Programs
- Indiana Laws and Programs
- International Drug Policies: Eradication of Narcotic Crops
- International Drug Policies: Interdiction and Law Enforcement
- International Drug Policies: International Cooperation
- International Drug Policies: Sanctions/Economic Assistance
- Iowa Laws and Programs
- “Just Say No”
- Kansas Laws and Programs
- Kentucky Laws and Programs
- Louisiana Laws and Programs
- Maine Laws and Programs
- Mandatory Sentencing
- Marihuana Tax Act (1937)
- Maryland Laws and Programs
- Massachusetts Laws and Programs
- Methadone Control Act
- Michigan Laws and Programs
- Minnesota Laws and Programs
- Mississippi Laws and Programs
- Missouri Laws and Programs
- Montana Laws and Programs
- Moral Panics and Drug Laws
- Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act
- Narcotic Control Act
- Narcotic Drug Act
- Narcotic Drug Import and Export Act
- Narcotics Manufacturers Act
- National Narcotics Act
- Native Races Act
- Nebraska Laws and Programs
- Nevada Laws and Programs
- New Hampshire Laws and Programs
- New Jersey Laws and Programs
- New Mexico Laws and Programs
- New York Laws and Programs
- 1946 Revision of Harrison Act
- North Carolina Laws and Programs
- North Dakota Laws and Programs
- Office of National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act
- Ohio Laws and Programs
- Oklahoma Laws and Programs
- Omnibus Drug Abuse Act
- Opium Poppy Control Act
- Oregon Laws and Programs
- Pennsylvania Laws and Programs
- Policies Regulating Alcohol, U.S.
- Policies Regulating Pharmaceutical Drugs, U.S.
- Policies Regulating Tobacco, U.S.
- Policing Techniques in the War on Drugs
- Porter Narcotic Farm Act
- Pure Food and Drug Act
- Reducing Americans' Vulnerability to Ecstasy Act (RAVE Act)
- Religious Freedom and Drug Laws
- Rhode Island Laws and Programs
- Rockefeller Laws
- Schedule of Controlled Substances
- South Carolina Laws and Programs
- South Dakota Laws and Programs
- Supply-Side Policies
- Tennessee Laws and Programs
- Testing and Sanctions
- Texas Laws and Programs
- Twenty-First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
- Uniform State Narcotics Act
- Utah Laws and Programs
- Vermont Laws and Programs
- Virginia Laws and Programs
- Volstead Act
- “War on Drugs”
- Washington Laws and Programs
- Webb-Kenyon Act
- West Virginia Laws and Programs
- Wisconsin Laws and Programs
- Workplace: Drug-Free Policy
- Workplace: Role, Prevention, and Programs
- Wyoming Laws and Programs
- Zero Tolerance
- Alcoholics Anonymous
- Anti-Drug Grassroots Organizations
- Anti-Tobacco Campaigns
- Armed Forces
- Bureau of Drug Abuse Control
- Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs
- D.A.R.E.
- Drug Enforcement Administration
- Drug Treatment Programs
- Federal Bureau of Narcotics
- International Drug Agencies
- International Narcotics Control Board
- Narcotics Anonymous
- National Organization for Reform of Marijuana Laws
- Office of Drug Abuse Law Enforcement
- Office of National Drug Control Policy
- Office of National Narcotics Intelligence
- Partnership for a Drug-Free America
- President's Advisory Commission on Narcotics and Drug Abuse (Prettyman)
- Secular Organizations for Sobriety
- Social Movements Against Drunken Driving
- Temperance Movement
- United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
- U.S. Department of State Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs
- Women for Sobriety
- Ambrose, Myles
- Anslinger, Harry
- Bartels, John
- Bennett, William
- Bensinger, Peter
- Bonner, Robert
- Bourne, Peter
- Brown, Lee
- Constantine, Thomas
- Dupont, Robert
- Giordano, Henry
- Greene, Stephen
- Hutchinson, Asa
- Ingersoll, John
- Kerlikowske, Gil
- Lawn, John
- Leonhart, Michele
- Lindesmith, Alfred
- Marshall, Donnie
- Martinez, Bob
- McCaffrey, Barry R.
- Mill, John Stuart
- Mullen, Francis
- Sullivan, William
- Tandy, Karen
- Turner, Carlton
- Walters, John
- Bush Administration, George H. W.
- Bush Administration, George W.
- Carter Administration, James
- Clinton Administration, William
- Coolidge Administration, Calvin
- Eisenhower Administration, Dwight
- Ford Administration, Gerald
- Harding Administration, Warren
- Hoover Administration, Herbert
- Johnson Administration, Lyndon
- Kennedy Administration, John F.
- Nixon Administration, Richard
- Obama Administration, Barack
- Presidential Administrations Prior to Federal Drug Regulation
- Reagan Administration, Ronald
- Roosevelt Administration, Franklin D.
- Roosevelt Administration, Theodore
- Taft Administration, William Howard
- Truman Administration, Harry
- Wilson Administration, Woodrow
- Addiction Maintenance
- Coerced Drug Treatment
- Disease Model of Use
- Drug Abuse Warning Network
- Drug Testing
- Drug Treatment Programs
- Evaluative Evidence of Prevention Programs
- Evaluative Evidence of Rehab/Treatment Programs
- Group Therapy
- Harm Reduction
- Inpatient Treatment Programs
- Laboratory Techniques
- Needle Exchange Programs
- Prescription Drug Abuse
- Prevention Programs
- Rational Addiction Model of Drug Use
- Rehabilitation/Treatment Programs
- Safe Injection Rooms
- Single Distribution Theory of Consumption
- SMART Recovery
- 12-Step Recovery Programs
- Alcohol
- Amphetamines
- Antagonist Medications
- Barbiturates
- Caffeine
- Club Drugs
- Cocaine
- Crack
- Ecstasy
- Freebase
- Hallucinogens
- Heroin
- Inhalants
- Ketamine
- Khat
- LSD
- Marijuana
- Methadone
- Methamphetamine
- Morphine
- Over-the-Counter Drugs
- Salvia Divinorum
- Sedatives
- Steroids
- Synthetic Narcotics
- Tobacco
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches