Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
California Laws and Programs
California's location, temperate climate, and diverse population have caused it to play a central role in drug policy initiatives for over a century. Its coastal location and proximity to the Mexican border have made it a key player in national drug enforcement initiatives. California's Mediterranean climate allows the cultivation of many crops, both legal and illegal, that can be used for recreational purposes. A continual inflow of residents, from other states and foreign countries, has created an atmosphere where illegal drugs often are available and the attitude toward these substances is frequently more accepting.
California's great size has also provided it with the resources and influence to affect national policies as well as those in neighboring states. Its attitude toward, and acceptance of, progressive policies such as those allowing medical use of marijuana and advocating for rehabilitation or treatment instead of punishment for drug-related offences have been especially far reaching. Because California is a major producer of grapes and wine, its laws and programs also have been greatly affected by national temperance movements.
Opium
California's current response to drugs and its enforcement of laws designed to prevent use of certain substances is influenced by a history of prohibition, control laws, and attempts at regulation that began in the 19th century. During the 19th century, an influx of Chinese immigrants came to California. In China, opium had become popular during the 18th century, and was often mixed with tobacco and smoked. After 1860 widespread opium production was common throughout China, ultimately resulting in a quarter of the population being addicted to the substance by the end of the century. As Chinese immigrants came to California, they brought with them the practice of using opium.
Before 1860 there had been little opium used in California, and no legal restrictions existed regarding its importation, sale, or use. As Chinese immigrants brought the substance with them, however, opium became more common, especially in the San Francisco area where the Chinese population was centered. By 1875 opium use had become widespread and problematic among both Caucasians and the Chinese. In response, San Francisco passed the Opium Den Ordinance, which prohibited the public smoking of opium. Fueled in part by anti-Chinese sentiments, the Opium Den Ordinance was also was a response intended to prevent opium usage spreading into the Caucasian population. The ordinance's effect was to push opium dens underground, a trend that continued throughout the rest of the century. As a result, opium dens actually grew in appeal, so much so that a list of known dens was published in San Francisco newspapers, furthering their popularity.
San Francisco supervisors experimented for a year with a license fee for wholesale opium dealers in an attempt to generate revenues. The success of this fee was short-lived. A resulting prohibition movement that followed this culminated in 1907 with the outlawing of all non-prescription sales of opium and cocaine. This era instituted new tactics for dealing with the drug problem, including drug raids, the use of informants, and the arrest of users. Such efforts culminated when the San Francisco Board of Pharmacy staged a large-scale bonfire in the heart of Chinatown, burning opium paraphernalia such as pipes and thus breaking the strength of the opium culture. After 1909 users were left to find new sources for their opium. Many would later turn to drugs that proved more difficult to detect and transport due to their more concentrated liquid form, such as morphine and heroin. This experience has in many ways colored California's later response to illegal drugs, with conflicting desires for prohibition being mixed with a more permissive attitude toward use and an understanding that taxing such substances could provide government revenue.
...
- Employment Division v. Smith (1990)
- Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente União do Vegetal (2006)
- Gonzales v. Oregon
- Gonzales v. Raich (2005)
- Gore v. United States (1958)
- Indianapolis v. Edmond (2000)
- Jin Fuey Moy v. United States (1920)
- Leary v. United States (1967)
- Lewis v. United States (1966)
- Linder v. United States (1925)
- People v. Woody (1964)
- United States v. Doremus (1919)
- United States v. Jeffers (1951)
- United States v. Kuch (1968)
- United States v. Sanchez (1950)
- United States v. Warner (1984)
- Convention on Psychotropic Substances, 1971
- Narcotics Limitation Convention of 1931
- National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse (1972)
- 1909 Shanghai Conference
- 1912 Hague Conference
- 1925 Geneva Convention on Opium and Other Drugs
- 1946 Revision of the Harrison Act
- Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961
- United Nations Convention Against the Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs
- Afghanistan
- Algeria
- Argentina
- Australia
- Azerbaijan
- Bahamas
- Bangladesh
- Belarus
- Belize
- Benin
- Bolivia
- Brazil
- Cambodia
- Canada
- Chile
- China
- Colombia
- Congo
- Costa Rica
- Cuba
- Denmark
- Dominican Republic
- Ecuador
- Egypt
- El Salvador
- France
- Germany
- Ghana
- Greece
- Guatemala
- Haiti
- Honduras
- Hong Kong
- India
- Indonesia
- Iran
- Iraq
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Jamaica
- Japan
- Jordan
- Kazakhstan
- Kenya
- Korea, South
- Kyrgyzstan
- Lao PDR
- Lebanon
- Libya
- Malaysia
- Mexico
- Morocco
- Myanmar
- Netherlands
- New Zealand
- Nicaragua
- Nigeria
- Pakistan
- Panama
- Papua New Guinea
- Paraguay
- Peru
- Philippines
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Russia
- Saudi Arabia
- Senegal
- Singapore
- South Africa
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Tajikistan
- Thailand
- Tunisia
- Turkey
- Uganda
- Ukraine
- United Kingdom
- United States
- Uruguay
- Uzbekistan
- Venezuela
- Vietnam
- Yemen
- Anti-Drug Operations, Pre-1960s
- Anti-Drug Operations, 1960s
- Anti-Drug Operations, 1970s
- Anti-Drug Operations, 1980s
- Anti-Drug Operations, 1990s
- Anti-Drug Operations, 2000s
- Asset Forfeiture
- Cocaine Cartels
- Data Collection Systems
- Drug Trafficking and Political Movements
- Drugs and Money Laundering
- Drugs and Terrorism
- Drugs-Crime Connection
- Golden Crescent
- Golden Triangle
- Prices and Volumes in Illicit Markets, Theories of
- Set and Setting
- Alabama Laws and Programs
- Alaska Laws and Programs
- Alcohol and Drug Abuse Education Amendments (1978)
- Analogue (Designer Drug) Act
- Anti-Drug Abuse Act (Drug-Free America Act)
- Anti-Drug Abuse Amendment Act
- Anti-Drug War Movement
- Arizona Laws and Programs
- Arkansas Laws and Programs
- Aviation Drug-Trafficking Control Act
- Boggs Act
- California Laws and Programs
- Colorado Laws and Programs
- Community Mental Health Centers Act
- Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984
- Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act
- Comprehensive Methamphetamine Control Act
- Connecticut Laws and Programs
- Controlled Substance Registrant Protection Act
- Controlled Substances Import and Export Act
- Controlled Substances Penalties Amendments Act
- Criminal Justice/Enforcement Strategies of Drug Control
- Dangerous Drug Diversion Control Act
- Delaware Laws and Programs
- Demand-Side Policies
- Diversion Programs
- Drug Abuse Control Amendments (1965)
- Drug Courts
- Drug Policies: General Strategies
- Drug Policy Effects on Rates of Crime
- Drug Policy Effects on Rates of Drug-Related Illnesses
- Drug Policy Effects on Rates of Drug-Related Injuries
- Drug Policy Effects on Rates of Incarceration
- Drug Policy Effects on Rates of Use
- Drug-Free Communities Act
- Drugs and the Death Sentence
- Durham-Humphrey Act
- Ecstasy Anti-Proliferation Act
- Eighteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
- Elite Model of Drug Laws
- Elite-Engineered Moral Panics
- Florida Laws and Programs
- Food and Drug Administration
- Georgia Laws and Programs
- Grassroots Model of Drug Laws
- Grassroots Moral Panics
- Group Model of Drug Laws
- Harrison Act
- Hawaii Laws and Programs
- Heroin Trafficking Act
- Idaho Laws and Programs
- Illicit Drug Anti-Proliferation Act
- Illinois Laws and Programs
- Indiana Laws and Programs
- International Drug Policies: Eradication of Narcotic Crops
- International Drug Policies: Interdiction and Law Enforcement
- International Drug Policies: International Cooperation
- International Drug Policies: Sanctions/Economic Assistance
- Iowa Laws and Programs
- “Just Say No”
- Kansas Laws and Programs
- Kentucky Laws and Programs
- Louisiana Laws and Programs
- Maine Laws and Programs
- Mandatory Sentencing
- Marihuana Tax Act (1937)
- Maryland Laws and Programs
- Massachusetts Laws and Programs
- Methadone Control Act
- Michigan Laws and Programs
- Minnesota Laws and Programs
- Mississippi Laws and Programs
- Missouri Laws and Programs
- Montana Laws and Programs
- Moral Panics and Drug Laws
- Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act
- Narcotic Control Act
- Narcotic Drug Act
- Narcotic Drug Import and Export Act
- Narcotics Manufacturers Act
- National Narcotics Act
- Native Races Act
- Nebraska Laws and Programs
- Nevada Laws and Programs
- New Hampshire Laws and Programs
- New Jersey Laws and Programs
- New Mexico Laws and Programs
- New York Laws and Programs
- 1946 Revision of Harrison Act
- North Carolina Laws and Programs
- North Dakota Laws and Programs
- Office of National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act
- Ohio Laws and Programs
- Oklahoma Laws and Programs
- Omnibus Drug Abuse Act
- Opium Poppy Control Act
- Oregon Laws and Programs
- Pennsylvania Laws and Programs
- Policies Regulating Alcohol, U.S.
- Policies Regulating Pharmaceutical Drugs, U.S.
- Policies Regulating Tobacco, U.S.
- Policing Techniques in the War on Drugs
- Porter Narcotic Farm Act
- Pure Food and Drug Act
- Reducing Americans' Vulnerability to Ecstasy Act (RAVE Act)
- Religious Freedom and Drug Laws
- Rhode Island Laws and Programs
- Rockefeller Laws
- Schedule of Controlled Substances
- South Carolina Laws and Programs
- South Dakota Laws and Programs
- Supply-Side Policies
- Tennessee Laws and Programs
- Testing and Sanctions
- Texas Laws and Programs
- Twenty-First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
- Uniform State Narcotics Act
- Utah Laws and Programs
- Vermont Laws and Programs
- Virginia Laws and Programs
- Volstead Act
- “War on Drugs”
- Washington Laws and Programs
- Webb-Kenyon Act
- West Virginia Laws and Programs
- Wisconsin Laws and Programs
- Workplace: Drug-Free Policy
- Workplace: Role, Prevention, and Programs
- Wyoming Laws and Programs
- Zero Tolerance
- Alcoholics Anonymous
- Anti-Drug Grassroots Organizations
- Anti-Tobacco Campaigns
- Armed Forces
- Bureau of Drug Abuse Control
- Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs
- D.A.R.E.
- Drug Enforcement Administration
- Drug Treatment Programs
- Federal Bureau of Narcotics
- International Drug Agencies
- International Narcotics Control Board
- Narcotics Anonymous
- National Organization for Reform of Marijuana Laws
- Office of Drug Abuse Law Enforcement
- Office of National Drug Control Policy
- Office of National Narcotics Intelligence
- Partnership for a Drug-Free America
- President's Advisory Commission on Narcotics and Drug Abuse (Prettyman)
- Secular Organizations for Sobriety
- Social Movements Against Drunken Driving
- Temperance Movement
- United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
- U.S. Department of State Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs
- Women for Sobriety
- Ambrose, Myles
- Anslinger, Harry
- Bartels, John
- Bennett, William
- Bensinger, Peter
- Bonner, Robert
- Bourne, Peter
- Brown, Lee
- Constantine, Thomas
- Dupont, Robert
- Giordano, Henry
- Greene, Stephen
- Hutchinson, Asa
- Ingersoll, John
- Kerlikowske, Gil
- Lawn, John
- Leonhart, Michele
- Lindesmith, Alfred
- Marshall, Donnie
- Martinez, Bob
- McCaffrey, Barry R.
- Mill, John Stuart
- Mullen, Francis
- Sullivan, William
- Tandy, Karen
- Turner, Carlton
- Walters, John
- Bush Administration, George H. W.
- Bush Administration, George W.
- Carter Administration, James
- Clinton Administration, William
- Coolidge Administration, Calvin
- Eisenhower Administration, Dwight
- Ford Administration, Gerald
- Harding Administration, Warren
- Hoover Administration, Herbert
- Johnson Administration, Lyndon
- Kennedy Administration, John F.
- Nixon Administration, Richard
- Obama Administration, Barack
- Presidential Administrations Prior to Federal Drug Regulation
- Reagan Administration, Ronald
- Roosevelt Administration, Franklin D.
- Roosevelt Administration, Theodore
- Taft Administration, William Howard
- Truman Administration, Harry
- Wilson Administration, Woodrow
- Addiction Maintenance
- Coerced Drug Treatment
- Disease Model of Use
- Drug Abuse Warning Network
- Drug Testing
- Drug Treatment Programs
- Evaluative Evidence of Prevention Programs
- Evaluative Evidence of Rehab/Treatment Programs
- Group Therapy
- Harm Reduction
- Inpatient Treatment Programs
- Laboratory Techniques
- Needle Exchange Programs
- Prescription Drug Abuse
- Prevention Programs
- Rational Addiction Model of Drug Use
- Rehabilitation/Treatment Programs
- Safe Injection Rooms
- Single Distribution Theory of Consumption
- SMART Recovery
- 12-Step Recovery Programs
- Alcohol
- Amphetamines
- Antagonist Medications
- Barbiturates
- Caffeine
- Club Drugs
- Cocaine
- Crack
- Ecstasy
- Freebase
- Hallucinogens
- Heroin
- Inhalants
- Ketamine
- Khat
- LSD
- Marijuana
- Methadone
- Methamphetamine
- Morphine
- Over-the-Counter Drugs
- Salvia Divinorum
- Sedatives
- Steroids
- Synthetic Narcotics
- Tobacco
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches