Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Religious Holidays in U.S. Schools

The institutionalization of religious holidays in U.S. public schools is part of the informal school curriculum that attempts to educate students toward a particular orientation of national citizenship. According to Valerie Pang, the conscious or the unconscious privileging of certain knowledge within school curriculum suggests the kinds of intellectual, cultural, and political decisions schools are making over cultural and religious discourses. Although the nature of privileging may vary across schools because of geographical and cultural variations, a number of writers have pointed out that mainstream Christian-affiliated holidays/events are often emphasized in U.S. schools. As Khyati Joshi argues, even though public schools are thought to be “neutral” or secular spaces where students can learn about various religious belief systems, school curriculum often marginalizes what is considered to be nonmainstream religious knowledge. As Joshi maintains, the lack of critical teaching and learning about diverse ways of knowing reinforces the belief that the Other is religiously inferior and different. This entry describes three approaches that address questions of curriculum inclusion of religious holidays in schools. The approaches are (1) dominant or ideological inclusion, (2) culturally relativistic inclusion, and (3) transformative inclusion.

Dominant/Ideological Inclusion

According to Rita Verma, the dominant interpretation of what constitutes religious knowledge to be acquired in schools is ethnocentric. The dominant approach to inclusion often claims that mainstream Christianity should be privileged in schools, including the need to fully celebrate and sanction Christian-based holidays. Most public schools align winter break and spring break with the Christian calendar's holidays of Christmas and Easter. Warren Blumenfeld maintains that those who hold dominant perspectives often oppose learning about diverse religions on the grounds that the inclusion could potentially dilute the validity of a mainstream Christian interpretation of the world. Diana Eck argues that the United States is becoming religiously diverse, yet the religiously heterogeneous nature of the society is often absent in public discussions. Fearing controversies, schools are often silent on how to incorporate diverse religious holidays in relation to religions such as Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and American Indian religions. Thus, as a number of writers point out, schools often follow the status quo approach to learning about religions in an attempt to avoid unwarranted attention; in doing so, they essentially marginalize religious holidays that are considered to be nonmainstream.

Given that school holidays and informal events associated with school holidays (e.g., the performances of school plays or musicals during winter season) often have overt or subliminal Christian references, some students who negotiate religions other than mainstream Christianity struggle to understand how schools could privilege one religion over others. Jasmin Zine points out that students who do not observe Christian holidays often have to prove that they indeed have legitimate reasons to be excused from attending school in order to take part in religious and cultural events. Awatif Elnour and Khadar Bashir-Ali describe how Muslim girls often find it difficult to negotiate the norms of schools that are often reluctant to recognize their religious identities.

Within an ideological framework that is inclusive, recognition of religious holidays is often framed within a two-part construction of religious belief systems. Binary logic categories are used to determine who are believers and nonbelievers, and which religious holidays are legitimate or authentic. Khyati Joshi argues that the dominant perspective renders the spiritual beliefs of the Other socially, theologically, and morally illegitimate and inferior. Joshi contends that because mainstream Christianity is often viewed as the authentic religion, those who negotiate belief systems other than mainstream Christianity are often viewed as inferior and are marginalized. The dominant perspective also equates secularism with naïveté or false consciousness and maintains that it has little productive value in schools and in society.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading