Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Over the past 2 decades, increases in high school graduation and college entry requirements have pressed schools to teach more advanced mathematics to a broader range of learners. To some educators, this situation seems untenable: How can we simultaneously increase rigor in and access to this notoriously challenging subject?

One pedagogical approach that has been shown to increase rigor in and access to mathematics is a form of groupwork known as complex instruction. This approach has been shown not only to narrow or eliminate achievement disparities among student demographic subgroups but also to create positive mathematical identities for many learners, thus supporting students' overall sense of academic competence.

Because of these positive outcomes, there has been a growing interest in developing collaborative secondary mathematics classrooms. Recognizing that collaborative learning involves more than rearranging student desks, educators have shown interest in the pedagogical tools and concepts that support students' mathematical success. This entry describes complex instruction by specifying how it supports equitable mathematics classrooms. It draws on the work of classroom teachers implementing complex instruction and on the literature on equitable mathematics teaching.

Principles for Equitable Mathematics Teaching

In reviewing the literature on equitable mathematics teaching, this entry distills the lessons into the following four principles that support the goals of effective collaborative learning.

  • Learning is not the same as achievement. Students' mathematical competence is often conflated with their level of achievement, which is typically signaled by the mathematics class that they are in. Although learning and achievement are related, they are not the same. Learning happens when students deepen and extend their knowledge of mathematical ideas. Achievement reflects how they are progressing in school. Most educators recognize the imperfect correlation: Some students progress without understanding, whereas other students understand without progressing. Nonetheless, students and teachers often respond to learning and achievement as the same thing, with negative consequences for student participation and students' academic identities.
  • Achievement gaps often reflect gaps in opportunities to learn. Although enrollment in advanced mathematics classes has increased overall because of changing graduation requirements, many low-income students and students from historically disenfranchised racial and ethnic groups continue to opt out of advanced mathematics. Different educational outcomes manifest themselves as disparate levels of achievement on standardized tests, but this focus on individual student achievement erases the radically different opportunities for mathematical learning that exist within and across schools that provide a critical context for these demographic patterns.
  • All students can be pushed to learn mathematics more deeply. Opportunity gaps exist for students across the achievement spectrum. Although the social and economic consequences are greatest for low-achieving students, opportunity gaps affect all students. Middle-achieving students may simply get by in mathematics class without learning much, missing the chance to develop their own intellectual powers and foreclosing future educational opportunities. Even high-achieving students need a better mathematics education. High-achieving students are often raced through the curriculum, often pushed past the rich connections that engage them in the subject or offer some of the affective pleasure that might spur them on to study it at higher levels. A key characteristic of equitable classrooms is that all students are supported to participate substantially in each phase of instruction, although not necessarily in the same ways. In equitable classrooms, all students have opportunities to learn meaningful mathematics, no matter their prior achievement.
  • Students need to see themselves in mathematics. In general, children do not see themselves as mathematicians in the same way they might see themselves in more expressive subjects like art or literature. Consequently, adolescents' emergent identities typically do not adhere to mathematics in the same way they might to these other content areas.

For students whose home culture or language differs from the school culture, the problem of alienation from mathematics is often exacerbated. Even something as simple as the way a question is phrased or singling out a student for praise may go against the grain of that student's home culture. When students do not see themselves in what they are learning, finding meaning in school activities is harder.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading