Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

What it means to be proficient in a language has been contested in society at large as well as in research communities and communities of practice. While the defining of language proficiency has at times been looked upon as an academic exercise, it is a profoundly political act that cannot be separated from issues of power and equity. Arguments about what constitutes language proficiency must be viewed in relationship to current dialogues about the role of language and languages in our society. Dialogues about language proficiency take place within the context of social issues such as immigration, with Standard English language proficiency and performance becoming a proxy for national identity. The current definition of language proficiency—that of the performance of Standard English—does not take into account the contextualized nature of language use. In addition, such a definition focuses mostly on the technical aspects of language as used by “proficient” users of the language, and is silent on the habits of mind needed to organize and produce such language.

Language Proficiency as Defined by Research Communities

Research communities interested in the definition of language proficiency include those of linguists and teachers of English. Linguists often define language proficiency in terms of performance across language's fundamental properties, including phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics. Phonology refers to the sounds of a language—phonics or phonemics—while morphology refers to word formation or grammar. The way linguistic elements such as words or phrases are put together to create meaning is referred to as syntax, and semantics is the study of meaning at the word or phrase level. Pragmatics is the study of how language creates meaning in specific contexts, or the relationship between sentences and the environment in which they occur.

Psycholinguists within the bilingualism research community have tended to focus on how one gains proficiency in an additional language, how, from a cognitive perspective, proficiency in one language affects proficiency in an additional language, and the amount of time needed to gain language proficiency in an additional language. Psycholinguists have also identified broad categories of language proficiency, such as “playground language,” or basic interpersonal cognitive skills (BICS), as compared to “academic language,” or cognitive academic language proficiency (CALP). While the BICS versus CALP dichotomy has been criticized, the idea still holds sway in the K–12 educational community as well as the bilingual education community.

In contrast, many sociolinguists have focused specifically on notions of language, language varieties, and power, and have explored the way that certain definitions of language proficiency are used to further the interests of specific communities. The research community among teachers of English has argued, likewise, that the notion of language proficiency can be understood only when it is examined as a construct that is nested within multiple societal literacies and those literacies' relationship to power in our society.

Language Proficiency as Defined by Communities of Professional Practice

The main communities of practice involved in the defining of language proficiency are the Association of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL)—an organization focused on English instruction worldwide, the mainstream English teaching profession including the English as a second language (ESL) K–12 profession, state departments of education, and the bilingual education community.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading