Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Freedom of Speech, Fundamentalist Schools and

Even though Christian fundamentalist schools educate less than 2% of the K–12 students in the United States, their educational philosophies and practices raise basic issues concerning their role in U.S. life and in the lives of the students they educate. Several fundamentalist beliefs reject key tenets associated with liberal democratic citizenship, including toleration for differing points of view concerning what constitutes a well-functioning democracy.

Although fundamentalist Christian schools are not homogenous in all aspects, the basic principles that guide their curricula generally rest on the following beliefs: the inerrancy of the Bible, creationism rather than evolution, salvation by faith alone, the sinfulness of homosexual behavior, and that women should submit willingly to their husbands. Dissent on these issues is strongly discouraged; however, the evidence that fundamentalist schools reject teaching many of the foundational principles of civic participation, which in theory at least are promoted in public schools, is lacking. Civic participation is not a single construct; it is composed of many different attitudes and values.

Roughly 10% of U.S. K–12 students attend non-public schools. Since the 1920s, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled, “The child is not the mere creature of the State;” thus ensuring the relative autonomy of nonpublic schools from state regulation. Most private schools in the United States are parochial; Roman Catholic schools constitute the largest number of nonpublic schools, but there are many other types of religious, experimental, and independent schools within this sector.

As a matter of fairness and accuracy, it should be noted that other religious schools, like fundamentalist schools, have a very low tolerance for dissent when it comes to certain theological and social doctrines. The Roman Catholic school system, for instance, has strong teachings on abortion, marriage, and homosexuality that are not subject to democratic decision making inside or outside the Church. This entry examines the topic of freedom of speech in fundamentalist schools from two perspectives: Do Christian fundamentalist schools undermine the democratic purposes of precollegiate education, and what evidence is there that fundamentalist schools suppress freedom of speech in their educational offerings?

Schools and Free Speech

Freedom of speech is protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution; religious freedom is also protected by the First Amendment. From these constitutional principles, it follows that citizens are free to educate their children according to the dictates of their conscience. As a nation, the United States permits families to opt out of mandatory public schooling to exercise their rights of free speech and freedom of religion. U.S. Christian fundamentalism pushes this principle to its outward limit because, unlike the Amish for example, religious fundamentalists are not simply sectarians living apart from society—they are often publicly and passionately hostile to traditional liberal educational values, principles, and practices. The primary reason many fundamentalist families opt out of the public system is their opposition to what they often refer to as secular humanism, a social and political perspective they find anathema to their most cherished convictions.

As a matter of state neutrality and fairness, fundamentalist parents are able to exercise their free speech by establishing their own schools. It is the case, however, that once a student is enrolled and enters a school—public or private—his or her right to free speech is limited. When schools mandate curricula that all students must study, they are effectively limiting the free speech of some students. Majoritarian beliefs can marginalize and sometimes ignore minority beliefs. Schools have normative climates that chill free speech for teachers and students, and the courts have made it clear that complete free speech in educational contexts is not constitutionally protected.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading