Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Early childhood multicultural education is a critical element of educational endeavors to respond to diversity and inequities. Young children (ages 3–8) are rapidly learning about the world and beginning to form beliefs about individuals, groups, and relationships. Although many people believe that young children do not “see” race and are innocent of any prejudice, research studies dating from the seminal work of Kenneth Clark and Mamie Phipps Clark in the late 1930s, 1940s, and 1950s have shown that young children are aware of race and often express and enact prejudicial beliefs in their comments and choices of playmates and materials. Likewise, many researchers have noted that, to varying degrees, young children make assumptions about people based on race, economic class, cultural practices, gender, and abilities and disabilities. Because young children tend to think in concrete ways and have difficulty imagining and connecting with experiences different from their own, they organize information in broad and dichotomous categories and often make sweeping assumptions about different groups that reflect the social, political, and economic histories of their respective communities and countries. Because young children are just beginning to form their ideas about the world, early childhood multicultural education has the potential to challenge biased misinformation and to broaden children's perspectives.

Early childhood education has incorporated multicultural principles quite easily because it has traditionally emphasized teaching the whole child and maintaining close relationships with families and communities. Play is also a centerpiece of most early childhood programs, and it offers a fluid and imaginative sphere in which to explore diversity and inequities with young children.

Growth and Development of the Field

Over the past 5 decades, the purpose of early childhood multicultural education has shifted from surface portrayals of cultural diversity to deeper analyses of power and oppression. Because early childhood curriculum is built largely on stories, arts and crafts, and music, initial multicultural efforts emphasized holidays, foods, and arts and crafts of disparate cultures. This approach was reinforced by the influx of commercial “multicultural” products—stories, dolls, plastic foods, posters, puzzles—that depict different racial groups and cultural practices in varying degrees of authenticity. In their 1989 text, Anti-Bias Curriculum: Tools for Empowering Young Children, Louise Derman-Sparks and colleagues boldly criticized these efforts as “tourist curricula.” They advocated shifting from the focus on cultural diversity to an antibias approach that embodies a critique of discrimination in all its forms—race, social class, gender, sexual preference, and abilities—and engagement in social activism to respond to these injustices. This broader definition and critical stance had a profound effect on early childhood multicultural education, and teachers and teacher educators in many countries recast their work as antibias teaching.

This shift in emphasis coincided with the emergence of critical race theory, which focuses on how racially based stratification and inequities affect individuals and groups. This theory gave rise to a number of observational and interview studies that showed that White children often made derogatory comments about images of unfamiliar groups and imposed subordinate roles on their classmates of color. Thus, supporting children to become aware of White privilege and to develop antiracist identities became another goal of early childhood multicultural education.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading