Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

This entry identifies research-based policies, processes, and practices that facilitate or impede effective teaching and high-level learning in schools serving racially and ethnically diverse students.

When attempting to narrow the achievement gap, schools most often target the improvement of teaching. Though this strategy is understandable and important, the professional development that is needed for educators to meet the needs of racially and ethnically diverse students, often referred to as culturally responsive pedagogy, is seldom delivered in the context of efforts to improve the teaching of core academic subjects.

Two other frequently heard remedies for racial and ethnic achievement gaps are strong leadership and an inclusive school culture, but neither of these provides much guidance for programmatic school improvement. Effective leadership is usually described in terms of heroic personal attributes—charismatic, committed, intolerant of failure, inspirational, and indefatigable. The complexity of school culture is often reduced to high expectations. In order to improve learning outcomes for racially and ethnically diverse students, educators must improve within-school policies and practices that are particularly relevant to facilitating the learning of diverse students. These policies and practices are the embodiment—the artifacts—of school cultures, and attending to them is among the essential tasks of school leaders.

Two other frequently prescribed sets of strategies for narrowing the achievement gap are: examining inequities across schools—such as allocation of teacher expertise and financial resources—and incorporating characteristics of effective schools. To be sure, students of color benefit from equitable resources, clear goals, alignment of curriculum and assessment, coherent academic programs, professional learning communities, extended learning time, staff stability, and other essentials of highly effective schools. This entry, however, focuses on those conditions within schools that particularly influence racially and ethnically diverse students' opportunities to learn at high levels.

Of course, race and ethnicity are not the only dimensions of diversity. But they are often correlated with other influences on learning, including socioeconomic status, community and family cultures, and English language facility. Moreover, every student is diverse in some way that is relevant to his or her learning. Thus, by focusing on school conditions that are particularly important to the success of students from racially and ethnically diverse backgrounds, this entry identifies school policies and practices that will improve the learning opportunities and outcomes of all students.

The Essentials of Diversity-Responsive Schools

Diversity-responsive schools employ school policies and practices that maximize opportunities to learn for all students, including nuanced monitoring of both outcomes and influences on learning, relevant professional development, access to and support for success with rigorous content, fair and sensible disciplinary practices, culturally and linguistically responsive family engagement, an inclusive school climate, efforts to recruit and retain a diverse staff, and open and productive discussions of issues related to race and ethnicity. These conditions may be thought of as indicators of a school's responsiveness to diversity.

Condition 1: Data-Based Decision Making

“Multiple forms of data are continuously collected and used to monitor possible racial and ethnic differences in student achievement, disciplinary actions, access to learning opportunities, and the composition of student learning groups” (TDSi, n.d.). Collecting and analyzing data on student test scores and dropout rates is commonplace. However, disaggregating outcomes by race and ethnicity needs to be more detailed than is required by state and federal policy because there are often big differences in student performance within broad categories such as Hispanic (Latino) or Asian-Pacific Islanders. Second, in addition to subgroup data on student achievement, data on differences in opportunities to learn—such as grouping for instruction, curricular differences, attendance, and discipline—are also needed to make problem solving possible. If such data are to lead to schoolwide improvement, the willingness and abilities to engage in collaborative decision-making issues related to race and ethnicity are critical though uncommon.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading