Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The National Association for Developmental Education (NADE) has defined developmental education as “a comprehensive process that focuses on the intellectual, social, and emotional growth and development of all students.” This definition reflects the American Council on Education's historical documents on the student personnel point of view, which promoted a focus on the “whole” student, as well as student development theories that focus on identity development and self-actualization. In the United States, however, the term developmental education continues to be used interchangeably with historical terms like preparatory, remedial, and compensatory education. Such terms have been used in previous eras to refer to courses, programs, and services for students considered “underprepared” for postsecondary education or at “high risk” of not achieving their postsecondary education goals or, from the institutional standpoint, not completing a degree program. In fact, when NADE was founded in 1976 it was known as the National Association for Remedial/Developmental Studies in Postsecondary Education. Today the term remedial is controversial because it implies that courses cover content and skill development that should have been acquired in middle or high school. Not only is remedial education based on perceived student deficits, but many educators, students, and parents believe that remediation should not be the responsibility of colleges and universities. Meanwhile, developmental courses focus on both cognitive and affective aspects of learning, are strengths based, and include development of both academic and life skills. As this entry illustrates, the difference between developmental education today and earlier models is important when considering pathways to access to higher education for students from historically marginalized populations.

Evolution of Developmental Education

Throughout the history of higher education in the U.S., there has been the need to provide academic assistance such as tutoring for some students, including in elite institutions that served only the affluent. The need for learning assistance grew after the Morrill Land Grant Act of 1862 extended the availability of public higher education, despite the general lack of free public secondary education at the time. In the 1920s, 2-year colleges began to emerge and were considered a point of access to postsecondary education for students who could not meet admissions standards for 4-year institutions.

In discussing the origins of contemporary models of developmental education in the United States, Martha Maxwell, an early leader in the field of developmental education, described the need for counseling related to study strategies and academic support for soldiers returning home after World War II to pursue educational opportunities supported by the Veterans Adjustment Act of 1944, more commonly known as the GI Bill. In the 1950s and 1960s, prior to the emergence of learning assistance centers, many of these services were provided in college and university counseling centers. Today veterans are but one of many diverse populations for whom developmental education programs and services can provide access to higher education as well enhancing educational opportunity and achievement. The Higher Education Act of 1965 offered financial aid to students who might otherwise have been unable to afford higher education. Terms like “nontraditional” and “disadvantaged” were commonly used to categorize students who did not fit the stereotype of the “traditional” 18- to 24-year-old affluent college student, who in the past had been more likely to be White, male, and English-speaking, with at least one college-educated parent. At many institutions, greater diversity was welcomed by educators who realized that higher education can be a critical step in achieving the “American dream,” and that a well-educated populace is necessary to remain competitive in a global economy. Developmental educators also understood that high school grade point average (GPA) and standardized test scores are not necessarily indicative of student potential. Developmental education can be a means of ameliorating past educational inequities as long as it is understood that these differences are often the result of societal structures that privilege some while disadvantaging others. Many developmental education programs strive not to label or stigmatize participating students, recognizing that it is not the students who should be perceived as “deficient.”

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading