Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Culturally responsive leadership involves those leadership practices that emphasize high expectations for student achievement; incorporate the history, values, and cultural knowledge of students' home communities in the school curriculum; and work to develop a critical consciousness among both students and faculty to challenge inequities in the larger society. Culturally responsive leadership also creates inclusive organizational structures at the school and district level that empower students and parents from diverse racial and ethnic communities. Similar terms such as culturally proficient leadership, culturally relevant leadership, multicultural leadership, and diversity leadership have been used to describe these leadership practices that support students from diverse ethnic and cultural backgrounds and create inclusive schooling environments. Although there may be subtle differences in how authors and researchers employ these terms, in general these approaches encourage school principals and district-level educational leaders to “lead for diversity” and work with teachers, parents, and the larger community to develop curriculum frameworks, instructional practices, and organizational structures that are consistent with the cultural orientations of ethnically diverse students and their families.

Development of Culturally Responsive Pedagogy

The concept of culturally responsive leadership arises from inquiry into culturally oriented teaching and pedagogical practices. Gloria Ladson-Billings coined the term culturally relevant pedagogy in her now classic study of eight exemplary teachers of African American students. Ladson-Billings built her “pedagogy of opposition” on the shoulders of previous anthropological work that noted a cultural mismatch between students from culturally diverse backgrounds and their teachers, particularly in language and verbal participation structures. Ladson-Billings's approach to the education of African American students included a focus on classroom interactions, school policies, and societal and historical contexts. In Ladson-Billings's view, culturally relevant pedagogy rests on three propositions: (1) students must experience academic success, (2) students must develop and maintain cultural competence, and (3) students must develop a critical consciousness through which they challenge the status quo of the social order.

In their model of culturally responsive teaching, Ana Maria Villegas and Tamara Lucas describe culturally responsive teachers as those who exemplify five dispositions and practices. First, they express a sociopolitical consciousness that enables them to examine their own racial and ethnic identity as well as how schools reproduce existing social inequalities. Second, culturally responsive teachers affirm the views of students from diverse backgrounds and view all students as capable learners who have experiences, concepts, and languages that can be built on and expanded in the learning process. This additive approach to education builds on students' “funds of knowledge” rather than ignoring their language and culture in the school curriculum. Third, these teachers are agents of change who are both responsible for and capable of bringing about greater equity in education. Fourth, culturally responsive teachers embrace constructivist views of teaching and learning that recognize that learners use prior knowledge to make sense of new input. This educational stance views learners as “builders,” not empty vessels, and promotes critical thinking, problem solving, collaboration, and the recognition of multiple perspectives. Fifth, culturally responsive teachers develop content knowledge about multicultural history and literature, access local community knowledge and draw on the expertise of community members, and use examples and analogies from students' lives to introduce and clarify concepts. Geneva Gay and Kipchoge Kirkland emphasize the critical consciousness aspect of culturally responsive teaching, arguing that teachers must know who they are as people, understand the contexts in which they teach, and question their knowledge base and assumptions. Gay and Kirkland posit that these self-reflective qualities are as important as developing effective instructional techniques.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading