Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Classroom assessments are a fundamental part of the daily lives of students. Teachers spend from one third to one half of their time in assessment-related activities. Students use their performances on assessments to judge their abilities and self-worth. When classroom assessments are of poor quality, teachers are likely to make poor instructional decisions, and students will not be able to judge their own progress. One critical aspect of assessment quality is the degree to which it is appropriate for the diversity of students in the classroom. This can be called cultural sensitivity. Its inverse is often called cultural bias.

Educational publishers have developed careful processes to ensure that instructional materials are appropriate for diverse students. Yet, despite the fact that teachers use published classroom assessments as their primary tool for determining student achievement, educational publishers rarely test the quality of classroom assessments. Nor do they evaluate the appropriateness of classroom assessments for a diverse population of students. In a retrospective on the state of classroom-based assessments, Richard Stiggins noted that although billions of dollars have been spent on district, state, national, and international standardized tests, nothing has been done to ensure the quality of assessments that occur in a student's daily life.

This entry explains why classroom assessments should be closely examined for biases that might detract from students' performances. It gives a brief description of the strategies used by publishers and large-scale test developers to review instructional materials for potential biases. It presents themes from deliberations of a bias and sensitivity review (BSR) committee to illustrate the subtle ways that bias and cultural insensitivity can creep into assessment materials. Finally, based on the ideas derived from publisher practices and the more nuanced themes from the BSR panel, it proposes strategies for creating or modifying classroom-based assessments so that they are appropriate for students from diverse backgrounds.

The Focus of Traditional Bias Reviews

Bias is not necessarily the same as prejudice. Biases are preferences or inclinations of which people are often unaware. According to reader response theory, all students bring their own background knowledge to the reading event, and that background knowledge influences how they individually interpret the text. If a person who is developing an assessment thinks that his or her interpretation of a story is the only “correct” one, he or she has a bias. If the student's interpretation is a reasonable interpretation of the text but differs from that of the assessment developer, then the test questions will be “biased against” the student. None of this has to be intentional, but it happens all the time.

Knowing that biases are hard to see, publishers of instructional programs develop systematic processes to minimize biases. They train their writers, artists, and editors to look for and avoid text or images that promote or demean any group. They watch for over- or underrepresentation of any group. They screen passages, topics, themes, and contexts for potentially offensive materials. They check for problematic vocabulary and linguistic features, stereotypes, and misrepresentations. Publishers also convene external review panels to look for potential sources of bias. Table 1 provides a summary of the issues that publishers include in their bias and sensitivity reviews.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading