Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Cultural diversity has been a key factor in shaping Canada and Canadians' sense of themselves from well before Canada was an independent nation and has been the central concern of citizenship education throughout Canada's history. In the first half of the 18th century, Lord Durham—a British administrator sent to investigate social unrest in the colonies of Upper and Lower Canada—reported that he found “two nations [English and French] warring in the bosom of a single state.” His proposed solution was to create political and social structures to foster the assimilation of one of those nations (the French) into the other. Although that assimilation did not occur, the view that diversity was a threat to national unity and therefore to the legitimacy of the Canadian state dominated policy making in citizenship and citizenship education well into the 20th century. This was followed by transition, often slow and halting, to the view that accommodation of and respect for diversity are at the very core of what Canada is, who Canadians are, and what Canada has to offer the world. This entry provides an overview of cultural diversity in Canada, describes the assimilationist nature of early citizenship education in the country, and discusses the transition to diversity and pluralism as the iconic focus for contemporary Canadian identity and programs in citizenship education.

The Deep Diversity of Canada

In many respects the range and depth of cultural diversity in Canada is not strikingly different from that of other Western democracies, and particularly other immigrant societies like the United States and Australia. However, Will Kymlicka, one of Canada's leading thinkers in the field, argues that Canada is unique in at least two respects: the fact that it includes three of the significant categories of diversity that have challenged policymakers around the world—national minorities, immigrant minorities, and indigenous minorities; and the degree to which Canada has developed constitutional and legal frameworks to ensure accommodation of diversity.

Canada has a long history in both of these areas. In terms of the former, French and British colonizers arrived in what is now Canada to find a rich array of Aboriginal Peoples with a wide range of cultures, languages, and systems of social organization and government. From the beginning, the Europeans tended to negotiate treaties with these groups rather than seeking to conquer them. This remains central to Canadian Aboriginals' sense of themselves as nations for, as they argue, treaties by their very nature are made between independent nations.

The Battle of Québec (also called the Battle of the Plains of Abraham) in 1759 helped bring an end to the global conflict between France and Britain known as the Seven Years' War and established Britain as the controlling colonial power in Canadian territory. Contrary to Lord Durham's intention outlined above, however, French Canadians were not subsequently assimilated into the growing English majority. In fact, the power-sharing arrangements between the federal and provincial governments established in the British North America Act (BNA Act) of 1867, which established Canada as a self-governing country, gave provinces control over key policy areas such as language and culture largely to ensure the flourishing of French language, culture, and legal structures in Québec and other provinces with significant Francophone minorities.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading