Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The term achievement gap is used to describe the disparities in educational outcomes between students of differing demographic characteristics such as gender, ethnicity, nationality, socio-economic status, and immigration status. For the purposes of this entry, the scope of the achievement gap is limited to K–12 students in the United States. On the lower end of the spectrum are African Americans, Native Americans, Latinos, and some Asian Americans (particularly immigrants from Southeast Asia such as Vietnamese, Cambodians, and Laotians). Those at the upper end are mainly Whites and other Asian Americans (particularly Korean, Chinese, and Japanese Americans). The achievement gap is a phenomenon of averages. The persistence of the gap between ethnic groups does not imply that all students achieve at the same level as others in the group. At the individual level, many students may exhibit atypically high or low educational outcomes that differ from most members of their ethnic groups, but on aggregate, an achievement gap has been shown to exist between different ethnic groups in the United States.

In the United States, many facets of the achievement gap are contentious—its measurement, causes, consequences, and the educational policies proposed to reduce it. By providing multiple perspectives on the achievement gap, this entry examines the achievement gap and describes how it is both a product and a driver of educational policy in the United States. For simplicity, the Black-White achievement gap is the focus of this entry. However, similar extrapolations can be made for gaps between other ethnicities on opposing ends of the spectrum, such as the White-Hispanic achievement gap.

Quantifying the Gap

There is no singular agreed-upon way of measuring the gap because differences in educational outcomes can imply myriad meanings, depending on the learning objectives that schools provide. Measurements of literacy ability, subject-specific abilities such as math or science skills, noncognitive skills such as leadership and citizenship skills, graduation rates, and college-readiness reveal different aspects of the gap between educational outcomes. To assess differences in academic capabilities, the chosen test format and testing organization, the age group tested, and the interpretation of test results also tell different stories of the achievement gap. The widespread use of standardized tests to measure the achievement gap has been criticized for not adequately measuring skills such as creativity, reasoning, problem solving, and research skills. However, because of the relative ease of administering such tests on a large scale, they are frequently used to measure educational outcomes.

Since its inception in 1970, the comprehensive National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) has been a widely used standardized test to make inferences about the achievement gap. The NAEP, covering multiple subjects and grades, is administered by the U.S. Department of Education and reports academic achievement at both the state and national levels. Standardized tests can show the presence of an achievement gap in two ways: (1) in norm-referenced terms, by expressing the gap in terms of standard deviations from White achievement, or (2) by reporting the range of scores among students who meet the proficiency cutoff point for the test.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading